评估可持续性:对标准的需求

Güler Aras, D. Crowther
{"title":"评估可持续性:对标准的需求","authors":"Güler Aras, D. Crowther","doi":"10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability is one of the most used words in relation to business activity and reporting atpresent, but its meaning is vague. We argue that its use is based upon the concepts of stewardshipand of the firm as going concerned, coupled with the traditional view of the transformationalprocess of a business. We further argue that this is problematic in the present global environmentwhen stewardship of resources is becoming paramount. We therefore argue that sustainabilityis actually based upon efficiency in the transformational process and equity in thedistribution of effects. We therefore argue for the need for standards in analysing and measuringsustainability and outline a more complete model which recognises distributional implications,and is developed into a model of operationalisability.   Copyright © www.iiste.org","PeriodicalId":31316,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","volume":"2 1","pages":"19-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Sustainability: a Need for Standards\",\"authors\":\"Güler Aras, D. Crowther\",\"doi\":\"10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainability is one of the most used words in relation to business activity and reporting atpresent, but its meaning is vague. We argue that its use is based upon the concepts of stewardshipand of the firm as going concerned, coupled with the traditional view of the transformationalprocess of a business. We further argue that this is problematic in the present global environmentwhen stewardship of resources is becoming paramount. We therefore argue that sustainabilityis actually based upon efficiency in the transformational process and equity in thedistribution of effects. We therefore argue for the need for standards in analysing and measuringsustainability and outline a more complete model which recognises distributional implications,and is developed into a model of operationalisability.   Copyright © www.iiste.org\",\"PeriodicalId\":31316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"19-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22164/ISEA.V2I1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

可持续性是目前与商业活动和报告相关的最常用词汇之一,但其含义是模糊的。我们认为,它的使用是基于管理和公司经营的概念,再加上企业转型过程的传统观点。我们进一步认为,在目前的全球环境中,当资源管理变得至关重要时,这是有问题的。因此,我们认为可持续性实际上是基于转型过程的效率和效应分配的公平。因此,我们认为有必要制定分析和衡量可持续性的标准,并勾勒出一个更完整的模型,该模型认识到分布的影响,并发展成为可操作性的模型。 Â版权所有©www.iiste.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Sustainability: a Need for Standards
Sustainability is one of the most used words in relation to business activity and reporting atpresent, but its meaning is vague. We argue that its use is based upon the concepts of stewardshipand of the firm as going concerned, coupled with the traditional view of the transformationalprocess of a business. We further argue that this is problematic in the present global environmentwhen stewardship of resources is becoming paramount. We therefore argue that sustainabilityis actually based upon efficiency in the transformational process and equity in thedistribution of effects. We therefore argue for the need for standards in analysing and measuringsustainability and outline a more complete model which recognises distributional implications,and is developed into a model of operationalisability.   Copyright © www.iiste.org
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信