一切为人民,没有为人民:una critica al populismo, Chantal Mouffe

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Armando Chaguaceda Noriega
{"title":"一切为人民,没有为人民:una critica al populismo, Chantal Mouffe","authors":"Armando Chaguaceda Noriega","doi":"10.18504/pl2957-014-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.","PeriodicalId":44121,"journal":{"name":"Perfiles Latinoamericanos","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tout pour le peuple, rien par le peuple: una crítica al populismo de Chantal Mouffe\",\"authors\":\"Armando Chaguaceda Noriega\",\"doi\":\"10.18504/pl2957-014-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfiles Latinoamericanos\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfiles Latinoamericanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-014-2021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfiles Latinoamericanos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2957-014-2021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Chantal Mouffe的理论政治著作可以从两个方面来解读。一方面,通过对冲突的适当处理和将公民代理扩展到传统形式之外的多元主义的扩展,她提出的能够撼动困扰我们大众自由主义共和国的僵化和麻木的斗争民主是值得注意的。另一方面,意识形态的偏见、无法解释当代社会的构成多元主义以及与实际存在的民粹主义的历史证据的脱节,使人们对穆芬式左翼民粹主义作为人民主权的载体和激进民主化的替代方案产生了怀疑。在这最后一个方向上,本文将说明穆弗民粹主义方法的假设与委内瑞拉独裁漂移之间的矛盾。为了应对当前的挑战,押注于一个扩大的、后自由主义的、非民粹主义的民主化的集体建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tout pour le peuple, rien par le peuple: una crítica al populismo de Chantal Mouffe
Chantal Mouffe’s theoretical-political work can be read from two registers. On the one hand, her proposal for an agonist democracy, capable of shaking the ossification and lethargy that afflict our mass liberal republics, is worthy of note, through an adequate processing of the conflict and an expansion of pluralism that extends citizen agency beyond traditional formats. On the other hand, the ideological bias, the inability to account for the constitutive pluralism of contemporary society and the divorce with the historical evidence of actually existing populism raise doubts about Mouffean left-wing populism as a vehicle for popular sovereignty and an alternative for radical democratization. In this last direction, this text will give an account of the contradictions between the presumptions of the Mouffean populist approach and the autocratic Venezuelan drift. Wagering on the collective construction of an expanded, post-liberal and non-populist democratization, for the challenges of the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perfiles Latinoamericanos
Perfiles Latinoamericanos SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信