考古数据在保护特权和访问请求之间

IF 0.4 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Archeologia e Calcolatori Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.19282/AC.29.2018.03

A. Gambino, Maria Letizia Bixio

{"title":"考古数据在保护特权和访问请求之间","authors":"A. Gambino, Maria Letizia Bixio","doi":"10.19282/AC.29.2018.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Which elements of the scientific documentation produced by archaeologists - especially those who are freelancers - in the field of excavation, scientific filing and research, are to be considered ‘processed data’? How can archaeologists see their ‘copyright’ protected, if there is any, when the documentation produced flows into the archives? Can the ‘raw data’, since it is beyond authorial prerogatives, be made public as a common heritage of mankind? This paper will try to outline the legitimacy of certain attributions and the ownership of choices regarding the diffusion of the archaeological documentation produced in controversial events in which overlapping public and private interests do not always coincide.","PeriodicalId":43161,"journal":{"name":"Archeologia e Calcolatori","volume":"1 1","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I dati archeologici tra prerogative di tutela e istanze di accesso\",\"authors\":\"A. Gambino, Maria Letizia Bixio\",\"doi\":\"10.19282/AC.29.2018.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Which elements of the scientific documentation produced by archaeologists - especially those who are freelancers - in the field of excavation, scientific filing and research, are to be considered ‘processed data’? How can archaeologists see their ‘copyright’ protected, if there is any, when the documentation produced flows into the archives? Can the ‘raw data’, since it is beyond authorial prerogatives, be made public as a common heritage of mankind? This paper will try to outline the legitimacy of certain attributions and the ownership of choices regarding the diffusion of the archaeological documentation produced in controversial events in which overlapping public and private interests do not always coincide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archeologia e Calcolatori\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"19-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archeologia e Calcolatori\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19282/AC.29.2018.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologia e Calcolatori","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19282/AC.29.2018.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

考古学家——尤其是那些自由职业者——在挖掘、科学归档和研究领域所产生的科学文献中，哪些元素被认为是“处理过的数据”?当制作出来的文件流入档案馆时，考古学家怎么能看到他们的“版权”受到保护，如果有的话?由于“原始数据”超出了权威的特权，是否可以作为人类的共同遗产公开?本文将试图概述某些归因的合法性，以及在有争议的事件中产生的考古文献传播的选择所有权，在这些事件中重叠的公共和私人利益并不总是一致的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

I dati archeologici tra prerogative di tutela e istanze di accesso

Which elements of the scientific documentation produced by archaeologists - especially those who are freelancers - in the field of excavation, scientific filing and research, are to be considered ‘processed data’? How can archaeologists see their ‘copyright’ protected, if there is any, when the documentation produced flows into the archives? Can the ‘raw data’, since it is beyond authorial prerogatives, be made public as a common heritage of mankind? This paper will try to outline the legitimacy of certain attributions and the ownership of choices regarding the diffusion of the archaeological documentation produced in controversial events in which overlapping public and private interests do not always coincide.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archeologia e Calcolatori ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

50.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 weeks

期刊介绍： From the outset, the aim was to initiate an open and continuous exchange of information among different countries, thus prompting the creation of an international Scientific Committee. Representatives of the major Italian and foreign institutes interested in archaeological computing agreed to become members. A qualified Editorial board also assures a continuous flow of information and a profitable exchange of data. The journal covers three distinct parts. The first considers methodological approaches: it collects articles concerning theoretical aspects of archaeological computing as well as reports on programmes conducted by dedicated international institutions. The main section contains articles on various computer applications, such as databases, Geographical Information Systems, quantitative methods, expert systems, computer graphics, image processing, multimedia and web tools. A section is also dedicated to the automatic processing of documentary sources. The third aspect of the journal is characterised by book reviews and bibliographic news, with the aim to provide readers with an up-to-date source of documentation. Special thematic issues and Conference Proceedings have also been included.