改善法学院的智力多样性

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
G. Dent
{"title":"改善法学院的智力多样性","authors":"G. Dent","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2324281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law school faculties tilt heavily to the left. There is no plausible explanation for this tilt other than discrimination against scholars who are politically incorrect. This imbalance is a serious problem for law students, who do not get the full range of views in important contemporary debates, and for legal scholarship, which would profit from an unbiased marketplace of ideas. The purpose of this paper is to discuss practical steps that might be taken to achieve a fairer representation of conservatives and libertarians in law schools. These include measures to induce the Association of American Law Schools abide by its professed commitment to viewpoint diversity; to improve viewpoint diversity at individual schools; and efforts directed at law schools generally.This paper is based on a presentation at a conference, Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy, held at Harvard Law School on April 5, 2013. It is scheduled to be published in a symposium issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.","PeriodicalId":46083,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Improved Intellectual Diversity in Law Schools\",\"authors\":\"G. Dent\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2324281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law school faculties tilt heavily to the left. There is no plausible explanation for this tilt other than discrimination against scholars who are politically incorrect. This imbalance is a serious problem for law students, who do not get the full range of views in important contemporary debates, and for legal scholarship, which would profit from an unbiased marketplace of ideas. The purpose of this paper is to discuss practical steps that might be taken to achieve a fairer representation of conservatives and libertarians in law schools. These include measures to induce the Association of American Law Schools abide by its professed commitment to viewpoint diversity; to improve viewpoint diversity at individual schools; and efforts directed at law schools generally.This paper is based on a presentation at a conference, Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy, held at Harvard Law School on April 5, 2013. It is scheduled to be published in a symposium issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2324281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2324281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

法学院的师资力量严重偏左。对于这种倾向,除了对政治不正确的学者的歧视之外,没有其他合理的解释。这种不平衡对法学院学生来说是一个严重的问题,因为他们无法在重要的当代辩论中获得全面的观点,而对法律学术来说,这将从一个公正的思想市场中受益。本文的目的是讨论可能采取的实际步骤,以实现保守派和自由意志主义者在法学院的更公平的代表。这些措施包括促使美国法学院协会(Association of American Law Schools)遵守其公开承诺的观点多样性;改善个别学校的观点多样性;以及针对法学院的努力。本文基于2013年4月5日在哈佛法学院举行的“智力多样性与法律学院”会议上的演讲。这篇文章将在《哈佛法律与公共政策杂志》的一期研讨会上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward Improved Intellectual Diversity in Law Schools
Law school faculties tilt heavily to the left. There is no plausible explanation for this tilt other than discrimination against scholars who are politically incorrect. This imbalance is a serious problem for law students, who do not get the full range of views in important contemporary debates, and for legal scholarship, which would profit from an unbiased marketplace of ideas. The purpose of this paper is to discuss practical steps that might be taken to achieve a fairer representation of conservatives and libertarians in law schools. These include measures to induce the Association of American Law Schools abide by its professed commitment to viewpoint diversity; to improve viewpoint diversity at individual schools; and efforts directed at law schools generally.This paper is based on a presentation at a conference, Intellectual Diversity and the Legal Academy, held at Harvard Law School on April 5, 2013. It is scheduled to be published in a symposium issue of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy is published three times annually by the Harvard Society for Law & Public Policy, Inc., an organization of Harvard Law School students. The Journal is one of the most widely circulated student-edited law reviews and the nation’s leading forum for conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. The late Stephen Eberhard and former Senator and Secretary of Energy E. Spencer Abraham founded the journal twenty-eight years ago and many journal alumni have risen to prominent legal positions in the government and at the nation’s top law firms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信