在DLT和eIDAS中引入隐私收据

Q3 Decision Sciences
Jan Lindquist
{"title":"在DLT和eIDAS中引入隐私收据","authors":"Jan Lindquist","doi":"10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of digital identification (e.g., eIDAS) and wallet standards (e.g., EUDI wallet) require compliance with privacy principles and clear communication of the principles through privacy notice and record of consent in the form of a privacy receipt. Regulation needs standards to help set the bar for reducing the privacy infringement risk. Without a standard-based implementation, solutions will be proprietary and siloed with no concern for interoperability, like privacy labels in Google and Apple app stores. Do existing standards address the gap, or do new ones need to be introduced? This article looks at the standards and regulations in three areas to answer this question: privacy protection standards, blockchain and DLT standards, and digital identification and wallet standards.","PeriodicalId":36697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ICT Standardization","volume":"11 2","pages":"117-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/10251929/10255407/10266732.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing Privacy Receipts into DLT and eIDAS\",\"authors\":\"Jan Lindquist\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction of digital identification (e.g., eIDAS) and wallet standards (e.g., EUDI wallet) require compliance with privacy principles and clear communication of the principles through privacy notice and record of consent in the form of a privacy receipt. Regulation needs standards to help set the bar for reducing the privacy infringement risk. Without a standard-based implementation, solutions will be proprietary and siloed with no concern for interoperability, like privacy labels in Google and Apple app stores. Do existing standards address the gap, or do new ones need to be introduced? This article looks at the standards and regulations in three areas to answer this question: privacy protection standards, blockchain and DLT standards, and digital identification and wallet standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ICT Standardization\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"117-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/10251929/10255407/10266732.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ICT Standardization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10266732/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ICT Standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10266732/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字身份识别(如eIDAS)和钱包标准(如EUDI钱包)的引入要求遵守隐私原则,并通过隐私通知和隐私收据形式的同意记录明确传达这些原则。监管需要标准来帮助设定降低侵犯隐私风险的标准。如果没有基于标准的实施,解决方案将是专有的、孤立的,不关心互操作性,就像谷歌和苹果应用商店中的隐私标签一样。现有的标准是否解决了这一差距,还是需要引入新的标准?本文着眼于三个领域的标准和法规来回答这个问题:隐私保护标准、区块链和DLT标准以及数字识别和钱包标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introducing Privacy Receipts into DLT and eIDAS
The introduction of digital identification (e.g., eIDAS) and wallet standards (e.g., EUDI wallet) require compliance with privacy principles and clear communication of the principles through privacy notice and record of consent in the form of a privacy receipt. Regulation needs standards to help set the bar for reducing the privacy infringement risk. Without a standard-based implementation, solutions will be proprietary and siloed with no concern for interoperability, like privacy labels in Google and Apple app stores. Do existing standards address the gap, or do new ones need to be introduced? This article looks at the standards and regulations in three areas to answer this question: privacy protection standards, blockchain and DLT standards, and digital identification and wallet standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of ICT Standardization
Journal of ICT Standardization Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信