1990-2019年亚洲、欧洲和拉丁美洲的经济增长和不平等

IF 0.6 4区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

Investigacion Economica Pub Date : 2020-12-29 DOI:10.22201/fe.01851667p.2021.315.77565

Verónica Cerezo García, Heri Oscar Landa Díaz

{"title":"1990-2019年亚洲、欧洲和拉丁美洲的经济增长和不平等","authors":"Verónica Cerezo García, Heri Oscar Landa Díaz","doi":"10.22201/fe.01851667p.2021.315.77565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el efecto de la liberalización comercial sobre la productividad, la distribución del ingreso y el crecimiento económico, además de examinar la capacidad de absorción que este proceso ha concedido a los países ante choques externos, como el Covid-19. Empíricamente, tomamos pie en la taxonomía de crecimiento y desigualdad de Fajnzylber (1990) y en un modelo panel para evaluar esta relación en Asia, América Latina y Europa durante el periodo 1990-2019. Los principales resultados muestran: 1) co-movimiento entre crecimiento y equidad en Asia, mientras que en América Latina hay rezagos significativos, y 2) la productividad y la competitividad no precio constituyen el factor dinamizante en Asia y Europa. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INEQUALITY IN ASIA, EUROPE, AND LATIN AMERICA, 1990-2019ABSTRACTThe paper’s aim is to analyse the effect of trade liberalization on productivity, income distribution and economic growth. The ability of a free-market oriented economy to fence off an exogenous shock such as the Covid-19 pandemic is also dealt with. Following Fajnzylber’s (1990) taxonomy of growth and inequality, we assess the relationship between trade liberalisation, growth and income distribution for a sample set of Asian, Latin American, and European countries over the period 1990-2019. Our main empirical results show that there exist: 1) a co-movement between growth and equality in Asia, but significant lags in both respects prevail in Latin America; 2) productivity and non-price competitiveness are the dynamizing factors in both Asia and Europe","PeriodicalId":44170,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Economica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRECIMIENTO ECONÓMICO Y DESIGUALDAD EN ASIA, EUROPA Y AMÉRICA LATINA, 1990-2019\",\"authors\":\"Verónica Cerezo García, Heri Oscar Landa Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/fe.01851667p.2021.315.77565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el efecto de la liberalización comercial sobre la productividad, la distribución del ingreso y el crecimiento económico, además de examinar la capacidad de absorción que este proceso ha concedido a los países ante choques externos, como el Covid-19. Empíricamente, tomamos pie en la taxonomía de crecimiento y desigualdad de Fajnzylber (1990) y en un modelo panel para evaluar esta relación en Asia, América Latina y Europa durante el periodo 1990-2019. Los principales resultados muestran: 1) co-movimiento entre crecimiento y equidad en Asia, mientras que en América Latina hay rezagos significativos, y 2) la productividad y la competitividad no precio constituyen el factor dinamizante en Asia y Europa. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INEQUALITY IN ASIA, EUROPE, AND LATIN AMERICA, 1990-2019ABSTRACTThe paper’s aim is to analyse the effect of trade liberalization on productivity, income distribution and economic growth. The ability of a free-market oriented economy to fence off an exogenous shock such as the Covid-19 pandemic is also dealt with. Following Fajnzylber’s (1990) taxonomy of growth and inequality, we assess the relationship between trade liberalisation, growth and income distribution for a sample set of Asian, Latin American, and European countries over the period 1990-2019. Our main empirical results show that there exist: 1) a co-movement between growth and equality in Asia, but significant lags in both respects prevail in Latin America; 2) productivity and non-price competitiveness are the dynamizing factors in both Asia and Europe\",\"PeriodicalId\":44170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion Economica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion Economica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2021.315.77565\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2021.315.77565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

这项工作的目的是分析贸易自由化对生产力、收入分配和经济增长的影响，并检查这一过程赋予各国应对外部冲击(如Covid-19)的吸收能力。从经验上讲，我们利用Fajnzylber(1990)的增长和不平等分类法和面板模型来评估1990-2019年亚洲、拉丁美洲和欧洲的这种关系。主要结果表明:1)亚洲增长和公平之间的协同运动，而拉丁美洲存在显著的滞后;2)生产率和非价格竞争力是亚洲和欧洲的动力因素。《亚洲、欧洲和拉丁美洲的经济增长和不平等》，1990-2019年摘要本文旨在分析贸易自由化对生产率、收入分配和经济增长的影响。自由市场经济抵御Covid-19大流行等外来冲击的能力也受到了削弱。根据Fajnzylber(1990)的《增长与不平等分类法》，我们评估了1990-2019年期间亚洲、拉丁美洲和欧洲国家的贸易自由化、增长和收入分配之间的关系。我们的主要实证结果表明:1)亚洲增长与平等之间存在着共同的运动，但拉丁美洲在这两个方面都存在着重大的滞后;2)生产力和非价格竞争力是亚洲和欧洲的动态因素

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

CRECIMIENTO ECONÓMICO Y DESIGUALDAD EN ASIA, EUROPA Y AMÉRICA LATINA, 1990-2019

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el efecto de la liberalización comercial sobre la productividad, la distribución del ingreso y el crecimiento económico, además de examinar la capacidad de absorción que este proceso ha concedido a los países ante choques externos, como el Covid-19. Empíricamente, tomamos pie en la taxonomía de crecimiento y desigualdad de Fajnzylber (1990) y en un modelo panel para evaluar esta relación en Asia, América Latina y Europa durante el periodo 1990-2019. Los principales resultados muestran: 1) co-movimiento entre crecimiento y equidad en Asia, mientras que en América Latina hay rezagos significativos, y 2) la productividad y la competitividad no precio constituyen el factor dinamizante en Asia y Europa. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INEQUALITY IN ASIA, EUROPE, AND LATIN AMERICA, 1990-2019ABSTRACTThe paper’s aim is to analyse the effect of trade liberalization on productivity, income distribution and economic growth. The ability of a free-market oriented economy to fence off an exogenous shock such as the Covid-19 pandemic is also dealt with. Following Fajnzylber’s (1990) taxonomy of growth and inequality, we assess the relationship between trade liberalisation, growth and income distribution for a sample set of Asian, Latin American, and European countries over the period 1990-2019. Our main empirical results show that there exist: 1) a co-movement between growth and equality in Asia, but significant lags in both respects prevail in Latin America; 2) productivity and non-price competitiveness are the dynamizing factors in both Asia and Europe

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Investigacion Economica ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： It is a specialized journal, bilingual (Spanish and English), plural and critical, which accepts and publishes scientific research articles in national and international economy. It is considered a public good that belongs to the University and society. Its vocation is to analyze the evolution of the theoretical and practical economics. In its pages the paradigms of economics, history of economic thought, the theories and debates about economic policy and its consequences, the diagnosis of the Mexican economy, the economic development of Latin America and the problems spread the world economy in general. It is a journal that does not discriminate plural none paradigm; theoretical orientation is unorthodox for epistemological reasons, not ideological preferences.