欧盟国家药品支出成本控制措施:比较分析

Paula Tele, W. Groot
{"title":"欧盟国家药品支出成本控制措施:比较分析","authors":"Paula Tele, W. Groot","doi":"10.2174/1874924000902010071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A vast majority of the EU countries are witnessing a rise in the share of public pharmaceutical spending in the total drugs expenditure. This urges governments to adopt cost containment measures through more stringent norms in their pharmaceutical policies. The aim of this paper is to review the existing pharmaceuticals cost-containment policies in the EU in order to illustrate the complexity of the drug policy decision making and to assess the effectiveness of the cost containment measures introduced so far in the 27 selected countries. The paper is focused on measures aimed at reducing the public expenditures on pharmaceutical products. It is shown that cost containment policies for pharmaceutical expenditure are mostly targeted towards supply side measures, as they are proved to be more effective than demand side measures. However, price control policies do not guarantee expenditure control as long as they are not accompanied by control over volume. Rationalizing consumption volume should be targeted as well by giving more importance to demand side measures. We argue that, given the structurally imperfect pharmaceutical market and the dominant position of the supply side, it is maybe unrealistic to expect cost containment measures to be very successful. With an aging European population demanding more health care and an enlarging EU, it is likely that the debate concerning pharmaceutical expenditure will become a never ending story. At the same time, substantial evidence shows that the effect of innovative drugs is worth the increased cost. Therefore, a change of perspective from the cost of medicines per se to the cost-benefit ratio of the pharmaceuticals might be the solution, almost ignored so far.","PeriodicalId":88329,"journal":{"name":"The open health services and policy journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"71-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Containment Measures for Pharmaceuticals Expenditure in the EU Countries: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Paula Tele, W. Groot\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874924000902010071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A vast majority of the EU countries are witnessing a rise in the share of public pharmaceutical spending in the total drugs expenditure. This urges governments to adopt cost containment measures through more stringent norms in their pharmaceutical policies. The aim of this paper is to review the existing pharmaceuticals cost-containment policies in the EU in order to illustrate the complexity of the drug policy decision making and to assess the effectiveness of the cost containment measures introduced so far in the 27 selected countries. The paper is focused on measures aimed at reducing the public expenditures on pharmaceutical products. It is shown that cost containment policies for pharmaceutical expenditure are mostly targeted towards supply side measures, as they are proved to be more effective than demand side measures. However, price control policies do not guarantee expenditure control as long as they are not accompanied by control over volume. Rationalizing consumption volume should be targeted as well by giving more importance to demand side measures. We argue that, given the structurally imperfect pharmaceutical market and the dominant position of the supply side, it is maybe unrealistic to expect cost containment measures to be very successful. With an aging European population demanding more health care and an enlarging EU, it is likely that the debate concerning pharmaceutical expenditure will become a never ending story. At the same time, substantial evidence shows that the effect of innovative drugs is worth the increased cost. Therefore, a change of perspective from the cost of medicines per se to the cost-benefit ratio of the pharmaceuticals might be the solution, almost ignored so far.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open health services and policy journal\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"71-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open health services and policy journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924000902010071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open health services and policy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874924000902010071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

绝大多数欧盟国家正在目睹公共药品支出在药品总支出中所占份额的上升。这敦促各国政府通过更严格的药品政策规范采取成本控制措施。本文的目的是审查欧盟现有的药品成本控制政策,以说明药物政策决策的复杂性,并评估迄今为止在选定的27个国家采取的成本控制措施的有效性。这篇论文的重点是旨在减少医药产品公共支出的措施。研究表明,药品支出的成本控制政策主要针对供应方面的措施,因为事实证明这些措施比需求方面的措施更有效。然而,价格控制政策并不能保证控制支出,只要它们不伴随着对数量的控制。通过更加重视需求侧措施,也应该有针对性地实现消费总量合理化。我们认为,鉴于结构不完善的医药市场和供给方的主导地位,期望成本控制措施非常成功可能是不现实的。随着欧洲人口的老龄化和欧盟的扩大,对医疗保健的需求越来越大,关于药品支出的争论很可能会成为一个永无止境的故事。与此同时,大量证据表明,创新药物的效果值得增加的成本。因此,从药物本身的成本到药物的成本效益比的角度的改变可能是解决方案,迄今几乎被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Containment Measures for Pharmaceuticals Expenditure in the EU Countries: A Comparative Analysis
A vast majority of the EU countries are witnessing a rise in the share of public pharmaceutical spending in the total drugs expenditure. This urges governments to adopt cost containment measures through more stringent norms in their pharmaceutical policies. The aim of this paper is to review the existing pharmaceuticals cost-containment policies in the EU in order to illustrate the complexity of the drug policy decision making and to assess the effectiveness of the cost containment measures introduced so far in the 27 selected countries. The paper is focused on measures aimed at reducing the public expenditures on pharmaceutical products. It is shown that cost containment policies for pharmaceutical expenditure are mostly targeted towards supply side measures, as they are proved to be more effective than demand side measures. However, price control policies do not guarantee expenditure control as long as they are not accompanied by control over volume. Rationalizing consumption volume should be targeted as well by giving more importance to demand side measures. We argue that, given the structurally imperfect pharmaceutical market and the dominant position of the supply side, it is maybe unrealistic to expect cost containment measures to be very successful. With an aging European population demanding more health care and an enlarging EU, it is likely that the debate concerning pharmaceutical expenditure will become a never ending story. At the same time, substantial evidence shows that the effect of innovative drugs is worth the increased cost. Therefore, a change of perspective from the cost of medicines per se to the cost-benefit ratio of the pharmaceuticals might be the solution, almost ignored so far.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信