首席大法官玛莎·特努斯:爱荷华州前首席大法官任期的内部观察

J. Cardinale
{"title":"首席大法官玛莎·特努斯:爱荷华州前首席大法官任期的内部观察","authors":"J. Cardinale","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2147803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will examine Ternus’ voting trends during her time as Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, from September 2006 to December 2010. In Part II, the Chief Justice’s upbringing and career path will be discussed. Part III will provide a brief overview of the history and composition of the Iowa Supreme Court. Then, in Part IV, Ternus’ voting patterns will be studied in two important ways. First, opinions authored by Ternus will be reviewed. Here, split decisions will be scrutinized more closely. Then, the sole dissent authored by Ternus as Chief Justice will be examined. Next, cases regarding child welfare will be evaluated. Additionally, comparisons will be drawn in terms of the number of child welfare cases decided on Ternus’ bench versus those decided on Chief Justice Lavorato’s bench, Ternus’ immediate predecessor. The methodology for each portion will be explained in the footnotes. An emphasis will be placed on cases that most accurately depict areas where the Chief Justice has a particular interest.","PeriodicalId":79773,"journal":{"name":"Albany law review","volume":"74 1","pages":"1811"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chief Justice Marsha Ternus: An Inside Look at the Tenure of Iowa's Former Chief Justice\",\"authors\":\"J. Cardinale\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2147803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will examine Ternus’ voting trends during her time as Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, from September 2006 to December 2010. In Part II, the Chief Justice’s upbringing and career path will be discussed. Part III will provide a brief overview of the history and composition of the Iowa Supreme Court. Then, in Part IV, Ternus’ voting patterns will be studied in two important ways. First, opinions authored by Ternus will be reviewed. Here, split decisions will be scrutinized more closely. Then, the sole dissent authored by Ternus as Chief Justice will be examined. Next, cases regarding child welfare will be evaluated. Additionally, comparisons will be drawn in terms of the number of child welfare cases decided on Ternus’ bench versus those decided on Chief Justice Lavorato’s bench, Ternus’ immediate predecessor. The methodology for each portion will be explained in the footnotes. An emphasis will be placed on cases that most accurately depict areas where the Chief Justice has a particular interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Albany law review\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"1811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Albany law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2147803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albany law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2147803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将考察特努斯在2006年9月至2010年12月担任爱荷华州最高法院首席大法官期间的投票趋势。第二部分将讨论首席法官的成长经历和职业道路。第三部分将简要概述爱荷华州最高法院的历史和组成。然后,在第四部分中,将从两个重要的方面对泰尔斯的投票模式进行研究。首先,将审查特努斯撰写的意见。在这里,分裂的决定将受到更密切的审查。然后,特努斯作为首席大法官撰写的唯一反对意见将被审查。接下来,将对有关儿童福利的案件进行评估。此外,将对特努斯的法官席上判决的儿童福利案件数量与特努斯的前任首席大法官拉沃拉托的法官席上判决的案件数量进行比较。每个部分的方法将在脚注中解释。重点将放在最准确地描述首席大法官特别感兴趣的领域的案件上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chief Justice Marsha Ternus: An Inside Look at the Tenure of Iowa's Former Chief Justice
This paper will examine Ternus’ voting trends during her time as Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, from September 2006 to December 2010. In Part II, the Chief Justice’s upbringing and career path will be discussed. Part III will provide a brief overview of the history and composition of the Iowa Supreme Court. Then, in Part IV, Ternus’ voting patterns will be studied in two important ways. First, opinions authored by Ternus will be reviewed. Here, split decisions will be scrutinized more closely. Then, the sole dissent authored by Ternus as Chief Justice will be examined. Next, cases regarding child welfare will be evaluated. Additionally, comparisons will be drawn in terms of the number of child welfare cases decided on Ternus’ bench versus those decided on Chief Justice Lavorato’s bench, Ternus’ immediate predecessor. The methodology for each portion will be explained in the footnotes. An emphasis will be placed on cases that most accurately depict areas where the Chief Justice has a particular interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信