现代性的挑战:理性作为答案

T. G. Stotskaya
{"title":"现代性的挑战:理性作为答案","authors":"T. G. Stotskaya","doi":"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-2-20-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of the philosophical and ideological content of the prob-lem of man vs technogenic civilization. Methodology and Approach. The author identifies the main trends in changing priorities in human at-titude to the world in the context of globalization. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the mani-festations of the transformation of modern social consciousness. Results. In everyday life, a modern person is faced with huge flows of information, receives knowledge from a variety of sources that sometimes contradict each other. However, the criteria for accepting or rejecting information may be completely different. A distinctive feature of the post-non-classical type of rationality is the ability to make operational decisions based on the use of a significant amount of information data. The weak side of this type of rationality is the involvement of its carriers in the field of various information manipulations. Theoretical and / or Practical Implications of this article lie in the analysis of transformations of public consciousness, which will allow us to build an image of the rationality of the future through the study of current trends.","PeriodicalId":33732,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY: RATIONALITY AS AN ANSWER\",\"authors\":\"T. G. Stotskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-2-20-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of the philosophical and ideological content of the prob-lem of man vs technogenic civilization. Methodology and Approach. The author identifies the main trends in changing priorities in human at-titude to the world in the context of globalization. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the mani-festations of the transformation of modern social consciousness. Results. In everyday life, a modern person is faced with huge flows of information, receives knowledge from a variety of sources that sometimes contradict each other. However, the criteria for accepting or rejecting information may be completely different. A distinctive feature of the post-non-classical type of rationality is the ability to make operational decisions based on the use of a significant amount of information data. The weak side of this type of rationality is the involvement of its carriers in the field of various information manipulations. Theoretical and / or Practical Implications of this article lie in the analysis of transformations of public consciousness, which will allow us to build an image of the rationality of the future through the study of current trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-2-20-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-2-20-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

。目的。本文致力于分析人类与技术文明问题的哲学和思想内涵。方法论和方法。作者指出了在全球化背景下人类对世界态度的优先次序发生变化的主要趋势。特别着重分析了现代社会意识转变的表现形式。结果。在日常生活中,现代人面临着巨大的信息流,从各种各样的来源接收知识,有时这些来源相互矛盾。然而,接受或拒绝信息的标准可能完全不同。后非古典理性类型的一个显著特征是基于使用大量信息数据做出操作决策的能力。这种理性的弱点在于其载体卷入了各种信息操纵领域。本文的理论和/或实践意义在于对公众意识转变的分析,这将使我们能够通过对当前趋势的研究来构建未来理性的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY: RATIONALITY AS AN ANSWER
. Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of the philosophical and ideological content of the prob-lem of man vs technogenic civilization. Methodology and Approach. The author identifies the main trends in changing priorities in human at-titude to the world in the context of globalization. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the mani-festations of the transformation of modern social consciousness. Results. In everyday life, a modern person is faced with huge flows of information, receives knowledge from a variety of sources that sometimes contradict each other. However, the criteria for accepting or rejecting information may be completely different. A distinctive feature of the post-non-classical type of rationality is the ability to make operational decisions based on the use of a significant amount of information data. The weak side of this type of rationality is the involvement of its carriers in the field of various information manipulations. Theoretical and / or Practical Implications of this article lie in the analysis of transformations of public consciousness, which will allow us to build an image of the rationality of the future through the study of current trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信