建立基线:新冠肺炎前南非大学学术咨询的社会现实主义视角

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. D. Klerk, De Klerk
{"title":"建立基线:新冠肺炎前南非大学学术咨询的社会现实主义视角","authors":"D. D. Klerk, De Klerk","doi":"10.20853/37-4-5342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic advising remains an emerging practice and profession within the South African higher education sector. Although there has been an increase in literature about advising in South Africa recently, there remains a dearth of literature about the experiences of academic advisors working in this context. This article aims to make such a contribution, by focusing in particular on the experiences and insights from 15 South African advisors (from one university) about academic advising prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data that informs this study was collected through semi-structured interviews. The focus in this article is on advisor responses to three of the interview questions, which proved sufficient because of the richness of the data. The study draws on elements of social realist Margaret Archer’s (1995) morphogenetic framework to explicate why this perspective on advising within a South African higher education context is necessary. Archer’s (1995, 2005) work on structure, culture, and agency is then used as analytic lenses with which to analyse the advisors’ experiences and insights of advising prior to the pandemic. A phenomenographic approach (Marton 1981; Tight 2016) is adopted to explore the varying conceptions (Cibangu and Hepworth 2016) of advising offered by the academic advisors. Nine focal areas emerge from these insights, which are analysed and discussed using Archer’s (1995, 2005) structure, culture, and agency. It becomes apparent that academic advising was complex even before the pandemic. The advisors express an urgency to help others, raise concerns about entrenched inequities and resource constraints, highlight the pitfalls of inadequate help-seeking among students, and emphasise the need for better institutional integration of academic advising at the advisors’ university, among other things. It becomes clear that there are numerous structural and cultural tensions that constrain advisor and student agency, possibly to the detriment of student success. The article leaves the reader with insights into the experiences of academic advisors prior to the pandemic, thus providing a baseline against which to measure advising during and beyond the pandemic, at a time when advising in South African higher education is still being developed and defined.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a baseline: A social realist perspective on academic advising at a South African university prior to COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"D. D. Klerk, De Klerk\",\"doi\":\"10.20853/37-4-5342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic advising remains an emerging practice and profession within the South African higher education sector. Although there has been an increase in literature about advising in South Africa recently, there remains a dearth of literature about the experiences of academic advisors working in this context. This article aims to make such a contribution, by focusing in particular on the experiences and insights from 15 South African advisors (from one university) about academic advising prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data that informs this study was collected through semi-structured interviews. The focus in this article is on advisor responses to three of the interview questions, which proved sufficient because of the richness of the data. The study draws on elements of social realist Margaret Archer’s (1995) morphogenetic framework to explicate why this perspective on advising within a South African higher education context is necessary. Archer’s (1995, 2005) work on structure, culture, and agency is then used as analytic lenses with which to analyse the advisors’ experiences and insights of advising prior to the pandemic. A phenomenographic approach (Marton 1981; Tight 2016) is adopted to explore the varying conceptions (Cibangu and Hepworth 2016) of advising offered by the academic advisors. Nine focal areas emerge from these insights, which are analysed and discussed using Archer’s (1995, 2005) structure, culture, and agency. It becomes apparent that academic advising was complex even before the pandemic. The advisors express an urgency to help others, raise concerns about entrenched inequities and resource constraints, highlight the pitfalls of inadequate help-seeking among students, and emphasise the need for better institutional integration of academic advising at the advisors’ university, among other things. It becomes clear that there are numerous structural and cultural tensions that constrain advisor and student agency, possibly to the detriment of student success. The article leaves the reader with insights into the experiences of academic advisors prior to the pandemic, thus providing a baseline against which to measure advising during and beyond the pandemic, at a time when advising in South African higher education is still being developed and defined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-4-5342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-4-5342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术咨询仍然是南非高等教育部门的新兴实践和职业。尽管最近南非关于咨询的文献有所增加,但关于学术顾问在此背景下工作的经验的文献仍然缺乏。本文旨在做出这样的贡献,特别关注15名南非顾问(来自一所大学)在COVID-19大流行之前关于学术咨询的经验和见解。本研究的数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的。本文的重点是顾问对三个面试问题的回答,由于数据的丰富性,这被证明是足够的。该研究借鉴了社会现实主义者玛格丽特·阿彻(Margaret Archer, 1995)的形态发生框架来解释为什么南非高等教育背景下的咨询观点是必要的。Archer(1995,2005)在结构、文化和机构方面的工作随后被用作分析镜头,用来分析顾问在大流行之前提供咨询的经验和见解。现象学方法(Marton 1981;采用Tight 2016)来探讨学术顾问提供的不同建议概念(Cibangu and Hepworth 2016)。从这些见解中产生了九个重点领域,并使用Archer(1995,2005)的结构,文化和代理进行了分析和讨论。很明显,即使在大流行之前,学术咨询也很复杂。顾问们表达了帮助他人的紧迫性,提出了对根深蒂固的不平等和资源限制的担忧,强调了学生寻求帮助不足的隐患,并强调了在顾问所在大学更好地整合学术咨询的必要性,以及其他一些事情。很明显,有许多结构和文化上的紧张关系限制了顾问和学生中介,这可能不利于学生的成功。这篇文章让读者了解了大流行之前学术顾问的经验,从而为在大流行期间和之后衡量咨询工作提供了一个基线,目前南非高等教育的咨询工作仍在发展和界定中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a baseline: A social realist perspective on academic advising at a South African university prior to COVID-19
Academic advising remains an emerging practice and profession within the South African higher education sector. Although there has been an increase in literature about advising in South Africa recently, there remains a dearth of literature about the experiences of academic advisors working in this context. This article aims to make such a contribution, by focusing in particular on the experiences and insights from 15 South African advisors (from one university) about academic advising prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data that informs this study was collected through semi-structured interviews. The focus in this article is on advisor responses to three of the interview questions, which proved sufficient because of the richness of the data. The study draws on elements of social realist Margaret Archer’s (1995) morphogenetic framework to explicate why this perspective on advising within a South African higher education context is necessary. Archer’s (1995, 2005) work on structure, culture, and agency is then used as analytic lenses with which to analyse the advisors’ experiences and insights of advising prior to the pandemic. A phenomenographic approach (Marton 1981; Tight 2016) is adopted to explore the varying conceptions (Cibangu and Hepworth 2016) of advising offered by the academic advisors. Nine focal areas emerge from these insights, which are analysed and discussed using Archer’s (1995, 2005) structure, culture, and agency. It becomes apparent that academic advising was complex even before the pandemic. The advisors express an urgency to help others, raise concerns about entrenched inequities and resource constraints, highlight the pitfalls of inadequate help-seeking among students, and emphasise the need for better institutional integration of academic advising at the advisors’ university, among other things. It becomes clear that there are numerous structural and cultural tensions that constrain advisor and student agency, possibly to the detriment of student success. The article leaves the reader with insights into the experiences of academic advisors prior to the pandemic, thus providing a baseline against which to measure advising during and beyond the pandemic, at a time when advising in South African higher education is still being developed and defined.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信