{"title":"从修复材料中释放氟化物","authors":"A. Carvalho, J. Cury","doi":"10.1590/S0103-06631998000400011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays there are several types of restorative materials with fluoride release properties. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the fluoride release from the following restorative materials, considering their different compositions. The materials used were: Chelon Fil-ESPE (CHE), Vitremer-3M (VIT), Variglass-DENTSPLY (VAR), Dyract-DENTSPLY (DYR) and Tetric-VIVADENT (TET). Six cylindrical samples (area = 1.65 cm2) of each material were prepared; each sample was then suspended individually in a plastic tube containing 2.0 mL of deionized water. The water was changed daily during 15 days. Fluoride release was determined after buffering the solution with an equal volume of TISABII. For the fluoride analysis, a fluoride electrode, Orion 96-09, and an ionalyser Orion EA 940 were used. All materials showed the same pattern of fluoride release during the 15-day experiment; the greatest fluoride release occurred during the first days and then it decreased rapidly toward a constant level. The fluoride released (mean ± standard error) in mg F/cm2 were: CHE = 7.62 ± 0.73A, VIT = 5.91 ± 0.79B, VAR = 2.72 ± 0.25C, DYR = 1.50 ± 0.17D, TE = 0.136 ± 0.016E. Means followed by different letters were significant (5%). The results showed that the composition of restorative materials influenced significantly the fluoride release.","PeriodicalId":77611,"journal":{"name":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"12 1","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberação de flúor de materiais restauradores\",\"authors\":\"A. Carvalho, J. Cury\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0103-06631998000400011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays there are several types of restorative materials with fluoride release properties. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the fluoride release from the following restorative materials, considering their different compositions. The materials used were: Chelon Fil-ESPE (CHE), Vitremer-3M (VIT), Variglass-DENTSPLY (VAR), Dyract-DENTSPLY (DYR) and Tetric-VIVADENT (TET). Six cylindrical samples (area = 1.65 cm2) of each material were prepared; each sample was then suspended individually in a plastic tube containing 2.0 mL of deionized water. The water was changed daily during 15 days. Fluoride release was determined after buffering the solution with an equal volume of TISABII. For the fluoride analysis, a fluoride electrode, Orion 96-09, and an ionalyser Orion EA 940 were used. All materials showed the same pattern of fluoride release during the 15-day experiment; the greatest fluoride release occurred during the first days and then it decreased rapidly toward a constant level. The fluoride released (mean ± standard error) in mg F/cm2 were: CHE = 7.62 ± 0.73A, VIT = 5.91 ± 0.79B, VAR = 2.72 ± 0.25C, DYR = 1.50 ± 0.17D, TE = 0.136 ± 0.016E. Means followed by different letters were significant (5%). The results showed that the composition of restorative materials influenced significantly the fluoride release.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"367-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631998000400011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631998000400011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
目前有几种具有氟释放特性的修复材料。因此,本研究的目的是分析以下修复材料的氟释放,考虑它们的不同成分。使用的材料有:Chelon file - espe (CHE)、Vitremer-3M (VIT)、Variglass-DENTSPLY (VAR)、Dyract-DENTSPLY (DYR)和Tetric-VIVADENT (TET)。每种材料制备了6个圆柱形样品(面积= 1.65 cm2);然后将每个样品分别悬浮在含有2.0 mL去离子水的塑料管中。在15天里,每天换一次水。用等体积的TISABII缓冲溶液后测定氟化物释放量。氟化物分析使用了Orion 96-09氟化物电极和Orion EA 940离子分析仪。在15天的实验中,所有材料的氟化物释放模式相同;氟化物释放量在头几天最大,然后迅速下降到一个恒定的水平。氟释放(平均±标准误差)(mg F/cm2): CHE = 7.62±0.73A, VIT = 5.91±0.79B, VAR = 2.72±0.25C, DYR = 1.50±0.17D, TE = 0.136±0.016E。不同字母后面的平均值显著(5%)。结果表明,修复材料的组成对氟的释放有显著影响。
Nowadays there are several types of restorative materials with fluoride release properties. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the fluoride release from the following restorative materials, considering their different compositions. The materials used were: Chelon Fil-ESPE (CHE), Vitremer-3M (VIT), Variglass-DENTSPLY (VAR), Dyract-DENTSPLY (DYR) and Tetric-VIVADENT (TET). Six cylindrical samples (area = 1.65 cm2) of each material were prepared; each sample was then suspended individually in a plastic tube containing 2.0 mL of deionized water. The water was changed daily during 15 days. Fluoride release was determined after buffering the solution with an equal volume of TISABII. For the fluoride analysis, a fluoride electrode, Orion 96-09, and an ionalyser Orion EA 940 were used. All materials showed the same pattern of fluoride release during the 15-day experiment; the greatest fluoride release occurred during the first days and then it decreased rapidly toward a constant level. The fluoride released (mean ± standard error) in mg F/cm2 were: CHE = 7.62 ± 0.73A, VIT = 5.91 ± 0.79B, VAR = 2.72 ± 0.25C, DYR = 1.50 ± 0.17D, TE = 0.136 ± 0.016E. Means followed by different letters were significant (5%). The results showed that the composition of restorative materials influenced significantly the fluoride release.