反对意见的增加:类型和词汇实现

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111

O. Boginskaya

{"title":"反对意见的增加:类型和词汇实现","authors":"O. Boginskaya","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience. The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied. The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS\",\"authors\":\"O. Boginskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience. The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied. The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-3-106-111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了促进作为法官在反对意见中使用的元话语特征的作用，以挑战多数人的决定并说服听众。目的是确定用于表示确定性和承诺的促进和词汇项目的类型。由于研究的目的是分析提升是如何在语言上实现的，因此采用了定量分析和解释分析的方法。研究显示，法官们广泛使用助推器来表达不同意见，并说服听众同意他们的观点。为此，他们使用了四种类型的促进，包括确定性促进、强度促进、团结促进和极端促进，其中第一种类型的数量优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS

The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience. The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied. The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.