对民主赤字的政治回应

Mira Bogdanović
{"title":"对民主赤字的政治回应","authors":"Mira Bogdanović","doi":"10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the present populism research follows two major lines of inquiry: one is top down, the other bottom up. the first one focuses on distilled abstract traits of the phenomenon with an emphasis on common features. the second one concentrates on distinct features of populisms country wise in historical per -spective. the first one maintains an undisguised liberal ideological bias and neglects populism as an (il)legitimate offspring of liberal democracy. the au thor argues that the second approach yields a deeper insight into the nature of contemporary populism as a by-product of the breakdown of traditional par ty politics.","PeriodicalId":34190,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Perspektive","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Populistički odgovor na demokratski deficit\",\"authors\":\"Mira Bogdanović\",\"doi\":\"10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"the present populism research follows two major lines of inquiry: one is top down, the other bottom up. the first one focuses on distilled abstract traits of the phenomenon with an emphasis on common features. the second one concentrates on distinct features of populisms country wise in historical per -spective. the first one maintains an undisguised liberal ideological bias and neglects populism as an (il)legitimate offspring of liberal democracy. the au thor argues that the second approach yields a deeper insight into the nature of contemporary populism as a by-product of the breakdown of traditional par ty politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politicke Perspektive\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politicke Perspektive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Perspektive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20901/PP.7.1-2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的民粹主义研究遵循两种主要的探究路线:一种是自上而下的,另一种是自下而上的。第一部分着重于对这一现象的抽象特征进行提炼,并强调其共同特征。第二部分从历史的角度分析民粹主义在国家层面的鲜明特征。前者保持着一种毫不掩饰的自由主义意识形态偏见,忽视民粹主义是自由民主主义的(非)合法后代。作者认为,第二种方法可以更深入地了解当代民粹主义作为传统政党政治崩溃的副产品的本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Populistički odgovor na demokratski deficit
the present populism research follows two major lines of inquiry: one is top down, the other bottom up. the first one focuses on distilled abstract traits of the phenomenon with an emphasis on common features. the second one concentrates on distinct features of populisms country wise in historical per -spective. the first one maintains an undisguised liberal ideological bias and neglects populism as an (il)legitimate offspring of liberal democracy. the au thor argues that the second approach yields a deeper insight into the nature of contemporary populism as a by-product of the breakdown of traditional par ty politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信