分组多准则法在失效模式和影响分析中优先考虑行动

Q3 Engineering
José Francisco Zanazzi, José Luis Zanazzi, Daniel Pontelli
{"title":"分组多准则法在失效模式和影响分析中优先考虑行动","authors":"José Francisco Zanazzi, José Luis Zanazzi, Daniel Pontelli","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20210057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims: The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality: Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method: An action-research approach is used. Main findings: Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice: A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis\",\"authors\":\"José Francisco Zanazzi, José Luis Zanazzi, Daniel Pontelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6513.20210057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paper aims: The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality: Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method: An action-research approach is used. Main findings: Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice: A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

失效模式和影响分析(Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA)方法在确定行动优先级、验证群体参与者之间的协议和评估不确定性方面存在困难。本文克服了这些缺点。建议采用传统格式的FMEA,确定改进行动的优先级,定期更新比传统更好的标准,并重视团队协议。原创性:其他贡献声称改变了方法,但这并不被应用它的组织所接受。此外,当FMEA本质上是基于群体的时候,他们提出了个别的方法。相比之下,该提案在不改变FMEA基本要求的情况下确定了优先事项。研究方法:采用行动研究方法。主要发现:应用的便利性、改善的小组学习和对行动计划的承诺得到证实。理论与实践启示:应用了一种新的群体决策方法,并提出了一种灵活的解决方案,适用于非常多样化的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
Paper aims: The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality: Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method: An action-research approach is used. Main findings: Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice: A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信