社交媒体与新闻研究(2003-2017):文献计量与内容回顾

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Francisco Segado-Boj
{"title":"社交媒体与新闻研究(2003-2017):文献计量与内容回顾","authors":"Francisco Segado-Boj","doi":"10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.","PeriodicalId":44216,"journal":{"name":"Transinformacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Segado-Boj\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transinformacao\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transinformacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transinformacao","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本文对截至2017年被Journal Citation Reports收录的期刊(n=213)发表的关于社交媒体和新闻的科学文献进行了文献计量学回顾。除了描述性测量外,它还提供了共引和共词分析。定量内容分析是文献计量学方法的补充。因此,本文对研究领域进行了概念和结构分析。结果显示,自2014年以来,该主题的文章数量稳步增长。美国、澳大利亚和英国是产量最高的国家。研究主要基于欧洲和北美的数据。确定了三个概念集群:受众参与、用户生成内容和社交媒体对新闻专业价值观和实践的影响。大多数研究没有考虑具体的服务,而是关注“社交媒体”的一般概念。Twitter一直是被分析最多的平台,直到最近几年,学术界的注意力转向了Facebook。研究更倾向于关注政治信息,而损害了新闻的其他分支。最常用的方法是内容分析和深度访谈。建议进一步使用调查和社会网络分析,以及更加注重视觉研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review
Abstract This paper introduces a bibliometric review of the scientific literature on social media and journalism published by journals indexed by Journal Citation Reports until 2017 (n=213). Besides descriptive measurements, it provides a co-citation and co-word analysis. A quantitative content analysis complements the bibliometric approach. Thus, the paper offers a conceptual and structural analysis of the field of study. Results show that the number of articles on the topic is growing steadily since 2014. United States, Australia and England stand as the most productive countries. Studies are based mostly on data from Europe and North America. Three conceptual clusters are identified: audience participation, user generated content and the influence of social media on journalistic professional values and practices. Most of the studies did not consider specific services but focused on the general concept of “social media”. Twitter was the most analyzed platform until recent years, when scholarly attention changed towards Facebook. Research has preferred focusing on political information in detriment of other branches of journalism. The most employed methods are content analysis and in-depth interviews. Further use of surveys and social network analysis, as well as stronger focus on visual studies, is suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transinformacao
Transinformacao INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Transinformação es una revista cuatrimestral especializada, abierta a las contribuciones de la comunidad científica nacional e internacional y editada por la Facultad de Biblioteconomía y el Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales Aplicadas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas. Fundada en 1989, está clasificada en la lista Qualis como A1 y publica artículos que contribuyen al estudio y el desarrollo científico de las Ciencias de la Información, la Biblioteconomía, la Archivología, la Museología y sus áreas afines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信