公安专业人员工作-家庭冲突量表的效度证据

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e39503.en

F. Coelho Junior, Mariana S. Rodrigues, Anneliese Mauch, Gislene S. L. Lopes, M. Chambel, C. Torres, Francisco G. L. Macedo

{"title":"公安专业人员工作-家庭冲突量表的效度证据","authors":"F. Coelho Junior, Mariana S. Rodrigues, Anneliese Mauch, Gislene S. L. Lopes, M. Chambel, C. Torres, Francisco G. L. Macedo","doi":"10.1590/0102.3772e39503.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.","PeriodicalId":35395,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals\",\"authors\":\"F. Coelho Junior, Mariana S. Rodrigues, Anneliese Mauch, Gislene S. L. Lopes, M. Chambel, C. Torres, Francisco G. L. Macedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0102.3772e39503.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39503.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39503.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是用10,383名巴西公共安全专业人员的样本来提供“工作-家庭冲突量表”的有效性证据。通过定义两个子样本应用交叉验证程序，进行探索性和验证性因素分析。遵循了所有的道德程序。探索性因子分析(“工作干扰家庭”因子，因子负荷量在0.91 ~ 0.81之间，α值为0.93，“家庭干扰工作”因子，因子负荷量在0.96 ~ 0.71之间，α值为0.90)和验证性分析(χ2/df .98;> .98 TLI;RMSEA <.10)显示了强有力的有效性证据，表明该量表在其他组织环境中的使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals

Abstract The aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.