把水倒回来:

AlTalim Pub Date : 2012-02-20 DOI:10.15548/JT.V19I1.1
Duski Samad
{"title":"把水倒回来:","authors":"Duski Samad","doi":"10.15548/JT.V19I1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.","PeriodicalId":30614,"journal":{"name":"AlTalim","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEMBINGKAI KEMBALI ILMU: KAJIAN KRITIS TENTANG DIKHOTOMI ILMU\",\"authors\":\"Duski Samad\",\"doi\":\"10.15548/JT.V19I1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlTalim\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlTalim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15548/JT.V19I1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTalim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/JT.V19I1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教科学和普通科学的存在一直是缩减科学世界的冗长论述。这两门科学的分离,通常被称为科学二分法,不仅给机构和设施带来了严重的影响,而且也给这两个分支的主要资源带来了严重的影响。更严重的是,这两门科学的分离也造成了差距,特别是在普通科学的优越性上。这种对宗教科学的不健康和缺乏客观的看法可能不是理所当然的;要对科学资源、科学方法和两个分支的历史存在进行综合解释,使之形成强统一、强互补的重塑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MEMBINGKAI KEMBALI ILMU: KAJIAN KRITIS TENTANG DIKHOTOMI ILMU
The existence of religious science and general science has been the long discourse that reduced the scientific world.  The separation of these two sciences, often refers to as science dichotomy, has brought about serious implication not only to institutions and facilities, but also the main resources of these two branches. More serious implication of the separation of these two sciences has also created the gaps particularly on the superiority of the general science.  This unhealthy and lack of objective view to religious science may not be taken for granted; comprehensive explanations of scientific resources, scientific method, and the historical existence of the two branches should be explored to reshape it in a strong unity and complementary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信