根据清洁空气法控制辅助排放:考虑储能作为最佳可用控制技术

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
D. N. Behles
{"title":"根据清洁空气法控制辅助排放:考虑储能作为最佳可用控制技术","authors":"D. N. Behles","doi":"10.15779/Z38D873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable energy is being deployed throughout the country to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. Reliance on increasing amounts of renewable energy, however, may lead to significant unanticipated increases in pollution because of the likelihood of fossil fuel facilities starting, stopping, and running more often to back up renewable resources. Estimates show that these emissions increases can drastically undercut the potential emission benefits of increased renewable penetration. To date, this changing role of fossil fuel facilities has not been thoughtfully evaluated in Clean Air Act permitting decisions for new and modified sources, even though the Act requires consideration of all methods to reduce air emissions. This Article describes why the Clean Air Act requires permitting authorities to fully evaluate the changing role of utilities in permitting decisions. This Article further describes why this evaluation should necessarily consider all available methods for reducing backup emissions, which includes energy storage and renewable energy resources. Consideration of energy storage or renewable energy to minimize ancillary emissions is consistent with the definition of Best Available Control Technology, and does not lead to a redefinition of the source.","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling Ancillary Emissions Under the Clean Air Act: Consideration of Energy Storage as Best Available Control Technology\",\"authors\":\"D. N. Behles\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38D873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Renewable energy is being deployed throughout the country to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. Reliance on increasing amounts of renewable energy, however, may lead to significant unanticipated increases in pollution because of the likelihood of fossil fuel facilities starting, stopping, and running more often to back up renewable resources. Estimates show that these emissions increases can drastically undercut the potential emission benefits of increased renewable penetration. To date, this changing role of fossil fuel facilities has not been thoughtfully evaluated in Clean Air Act permitting decisions for new and modified sources, even though the Act requires consideration of all methods to reduce air emissions. This Article describes why the Clean Air Act requires permitting authorities to fully evaluate the changing role of utilities in permitting decisions. This Article further describes why this evaluation should necessarily consider all available methods for reducing backup emissions, which includes energy storage and renewable energy resources. Consideration of energy storage or renewable energy to minimize ancillary emissions is consistent with the definition of Best Available Control Technology, and does not lead to a redefinition of the source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38D873\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38D873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

可再生能源正在全国范围内部署,以减少空气污染和温室气体。然而,依赖越来越多的可再生能源,可能会导致污染显著增加,因为化石燃料设施可能会更频繁地启动、停止和运行,以支持可再生资源。估计表明,这些排放量的增加会大大削弱可再生能源普及率提高所带来的潜在排放效益。迄今为止,尽管《清洁空气法》要求考虑所有减少空气排放的方法,但允许使用新能源和改良能源的《清洁空气法》尚未对化石燃料设施的这种变化作用进行深思熟虑的评估。本文描述了为什么《清洁空气法》要求许可当局在许可决定中充分评估公用事业公司不断变化的作用。本文进一步描述了为什么这种评估必须考虑所有可用的方法来减少备用排放,其中包括能源储存和可再生能源。考虑储能或可再生能源以最小化辅助排放与最佳可用控制技术的定义是一致的,并且不会导致对源的重新定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controlling Ancillary Emissions Under the Clean Air Act: Consideration of Energy Storage as Best Available Control Technology
Renewable energy is being deployed throughout the country to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. Reliance on increasing amounts of renewable energy, however, may lead to significant unanticipated increases in pollution because of the likelihood of fossil fuel facilities starting, stopping, and running more often to back up renewable resources. Estimates show that these emissions increases can drastically undercut the potential emission benefits of increased renewable penetration. To date, this changing role of fossil fuel facilities has not been thoughtfully evaluated in Clean Air Act permitting decisions for new and modified sources, even though the Act requires consideration of all methods to reduce air emissions. This Article describes why the Clean Air Act requires permitting authorities to fully evaluate the changing role of utilities in permitting decisions. This Article further describes why this evaluation should necessarily consider all available methods for reducing backup emissions, which includes energy storage and renewable energy resources. Consideration of energy storage or renewable energy to minimize ancillary emissions is consistent with the definition of Best Available Control Technology, and does not lead to a redefinition of the source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信