臭名昭著的支持:美国第一委员会和政策的个人化

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
G. Fine
{"title":"臭名昭著的支持:美国第一委员会和政策的个人化","authors":"G. Fine","doi":"10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a political world characterized by social movement rivalry, advocates routinely use reputation work to discredit the motivations and character of their adversaries. Reputational entrepreneurs undercut organizational legitimacy by depicting members with disreputable or radical affiliations as representative of their opponents. These attacks on character must be countered, costing resources and limiting organizational reach. Through reputation work, advocates assert that groups they oppose have a large proportion of stigmatized supporters, are affiliated with prominent disreputable figures, and espouse policies favored by such figures. Such claims direct attention from the substance of the debate, directing attention to the moral stature of claimants. Those attacked must rely on counter strategies to defend themselves. They deny that disreputables are representative, demonstrating their bona fides by exclusive practices, claim that opposing groups have the same problem, and suggest that stigmatized suppo...","PeriodicalId":47309,"journal":{"name":"Mobilization","volume":"11 1","pages":"405-426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notorious Support: The America First Committee and The Personalization of Policy\",\"authors\":\"G. Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a political world characterized by social movement rivalry, advocates routinely use reputation work to discredit the motivations and character of their adversaries. Reputational entrepreneurs undercut organizational legitimacy by depicting members with disreputable or radical affiliations as representative of their opponents. These attacks on character must be countered, costing resources and limiting organizational reach. Through reputation work, advocates assert that groups they oppose have a large proportion of stigmatized supporters, are affiliated with prominent disreputable figures, and espouse policies favored by such figures. Such claims direct attention from the substance of the debate, directing attention to the moral stature of claimants. Those attacked must rely on counter strategies to defend themselves. They deny that disreputables are representative, demonstrating their bona fides by exclusive practices, claim that opposing groups have the same problem, and suggest that stigmatized suppo...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mobilization\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"405-426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mobilization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobilization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17813/MAIQ.11.4.16719V547Q255438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在一个以社会运动竞争为特征的政治世界里,拥护者通常会利用名誉工作来诋毁对手的动机和性格。声誉企业家通过将声名狼藉或激进的成员描述为其对手的代表来削弱组织的合法性。这些针对角色的攻击必须予以反击,这将耗费资源并限制组织的影响力。通过声誉工作,倡导者声称他们反对的团体有很大一部分被污名化的支持者,与声名狼藉的知名人物有关联,并支持这些人物所青睐的政策。这种主张把人们的注意力从辩论的实质引开,把人们的注意力引到主张者的道德地位上。被攻击者必须依靠反击策略来保护自己。他们否认声名狼藉者具有代表性,通过排他性的做法来表明他们的诚意,声称对立群体也有同样的问题,并建议污名化的支持……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Notorious Support: The America First Committee and The Personalization of Policy
In a political world characterized by social movement rivalry, advocates routinely use reputation work to discredit the motivations and character of their adversaries. Reputational entrepreneurs undercut organizational legitimacy by depicting members with disreputable or radical affiliations as representative of their opponents. These attacks on character must be countered, costing resources and limiting organizational reach. Through reputation work, advocates assert that groups they oppose have a large proportion of stigmatized supporters, are affiliated with prominent disreputable figures, and espouse policies favored by such figures. Such claims direct attention from the substance of the debate, directing attention to the moral stature of claimants. Those attacked must rely on counter strategies to defend themselves. They deny that disreputables are representative, demonstrating their bona fides by exclusive practices, claim that opposing groups have the same problem, and suggest that stigmatized suppo...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mobilization
Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信