巴西的紧急和紧急护理网络:综合审查

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro
{"title":"巴西的紧急和紧急护理网络:综合审查","authors":"Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro","doi":"10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.","PeriodicalId":46918,"journal":{"name":"Saude E Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent and emergency care networks in Brazil: an integrative review\",\"authors\":\"Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude E Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紧急和紧急护理网络(RUE)是在巴西提出的一项公共政策,以阐明和整合巴西国家卫生系统(SUS)的卫生服务,扩大和资格的用户访问在紧急卫生情况下,有效和及时的方式。本研究分析了巴西关于RUE的科学成果,并阐述了显示这一卫生政策的局限性和挑战的摘要。通过检索LILACS、SciELO和MEDLINE数据库中的文章和Nível Superior (CAPES)虚拟平台上的论文和论文,采用综合文献综述的方法。通过调查,能够对集体卫生领域的34项研究进行分析,重点是不同的紧急服务及其之间的整合,包括保健过程可能发生的变化和不同的评价战略,采用不同的方法,主要是定性方法。在网络衔接中观察到弱点,维持医院服务的中心地位及其象征性资本的力量,初级保健被降级到话语领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urgent and emergency care networks in Brazil: an integrative review
Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saude E Sociedade
Saude E Sociedade PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信