美国医疗保健的未来:医疗保险真的更“省钱”吗?

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS

Economists Voice Pub Date : 2014-11-01 DOI:10.1515/EV-2013-0013

A. Edlin, D. Goldman, Adam A. Leive

{"title":"美国医疗保健的未来:医疗保险真的更“省钱”吗?","authors":"A. Edlin, D. Goldman, Adam A. Leive","doi":"10.1515/EV-2013-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and others see Medicare as a panacea. Krugman, for example, points out that average Medicare costs have grown only 400 percent while private insurance costs have grown 700 percent. Should the US move to Medicare for all? The case is not as clear as such statistics suggest.","PeriodicalId":42390,"journal":{"name":"Economists Voice","volume":"11 1","pages":"13 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/EV-2013-0013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of US Health Care: Is Medicare Really Better at “Saving” Money?\",\"authors\":\"A. Edlin, D. Goldman, Adam A. Leive\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/EV-2013-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and others see Medicare as a panacea. Krugman, for example, points out that average Medicare costs have grown only 400 percent while private insurance costs have grown 700 percent. Should the US move to Medicare for all? The case is not as clear as such statistics suggest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economists Voice\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/EV-2013-0013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economists Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/EV-2013-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economists Voice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/EV-2013-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

保罗·克鲁格曼、罗伯特·赖希等人将医疗保险视为灵丹妙药。例如，克鲁格曼指出，医疗保险的平均成本只增长了400%，而私人保险的成本却增长了700%。美国应该转向全民医保吗?情况并不像这些统计数字所显示的那样清楚。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Future of US Health Care: Is Medicare Really Better at “Saving” Money?

Abstract Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, and others see Medicare as a panacea. Krugman, for example, points out that average Medicare costs have grown only 400 percent while private insurance costs have grown 700 percent. Should the US move to Medicare for all? The case is not as clear as such statistics suggest.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.