捆绑神话,笨拙神话:古今神话手册中的洪水神话

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
R. S. Smith
{"title":"捆绑神话,笨拙神话:古今神话手册中的洪水神话","authors":"R. S. Smith","doi":"10.1515/arege-2014-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay analyzes the narrative accounts of Deucalion’s flood within the broader context of human creation in two ancient mythographical works of myth (Ovid, Apollodorus) and three modern handbooks. In each case the mythographer has been forced to reshape the episodic-one might say disparate and conflicting -nature of her or his sources and invent new connective tissue to organize early mythic time. The authorial voice and narrative aims of all writers attempting to create a coherent and comprehensive account of this period remain operative even in subliterary works such as Apollodorus’ Bibliotheke and render source criticism problematic.","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"16 1","pages":"243 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2014-0014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bundling Myth, Bungling Myth: The Flood Myth in Ancient and Modern Handbooks of Myth\",\"authors\":\"R. S. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/arege-2014-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This essay analyzes the narrative accounts of Deucalion’s flood within the broader context of human creation in two ancient mythographical works of myth (Ovid, Apollodorus) and three modern handbooks. In each case the mythographer has been forced to reshape the episodic-one might say disparate and conflicting -nature of her or his sources and invent new connective tissue to organize early mythic time. The authorial voice and narrative aims of all writers attempting to create a coherent and comprehensive account of this period remain operative even in subliterary works such as Apollodorus’ Bibliotheke and render source criticism problematic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2014-0014\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2014-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2014-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文分析了两部古代神话作品(《奥维德》、《阿波洛多罗斯》)和三本现代手册在人类创造的大背景下对丢卡利翁洪水的叙述。在每一种情况下,神话作者都被迫重新塑造她或他的资料来源的情节性——有人可能会说不同的和相互矛盾的——并创造新的结缔组织来组织早期的神话时间。作者的声音和叙事目的,所有作家试图创造一个连贯的,全面的描述这一时期,即使在亚文学作品,如Apollodorus的《Bibliotheke》中仍然有效,并使源批评问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bundling Myth, Bungling Myth: The Flood Myth in Ancient and Modern Handbooks of Myth
Abstract This essay analyzes the narrative accounts of Deucalion’s flood within the broader context of human creation in two ancient mythographical works of myth (Ovid, Apollodorus) and three modern handbooks. In each case the mythographer has been forced to reshape the episodic-one might say disparate and conflicting -nature of her or his sources and invent new connective tissue to organize early mythic time. The authorial voice and narrative aims of all writers attempting to create a coherent and comprehensive account of this period remain operative even in subliterary works such as Apollodorus’ Bibliotheke and render source criticism problematic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信