整体知识管理评估工具的构建与内容验证

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Fábio Corrêa, Fabrício Ziviani, D. B. F. Carvalho, Vinícius Figueiredo de Faria, Fernando Silva Parreiras
{"title":"整体知识管理评估工具的构建与内容验证","authors":"Fábio Corrêa, Fabrício Ziviani, D. B. F. Carvalho, Vinícius Figueiredo de Faria, Fernando Silva Parreiras","doi":"10.1590/1981-5344/37583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.","PeriodicalId":45038,"journal":{"name":"Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management\",\"authors\":\"Fábio Corrêa, Fabrício Ziviani, D. B. F. Carvalho, Vinícius Figueiredo de Faria, Fernando Silva Parreiras\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-5344/37583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/37583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/37583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

知识管理是一个研究领域,旨在阐明影响知识的各种组织维度之间的复杂关系。测量作为知识管理的一个维度,提出对组织所在地的知识管理水平或能力进行测量。然而,用于此目的的工具在没有明显的心理测量评估的情况下表达,并且它们没有阐明整体观点,体现在这种管理成功的关键维度的总体上。同时,本研究旨在建立并验证一个评估整体知识管理的工具。因此,这是一种定量方法的描述性研究,它利用了四位专家法官对构建工具陈述的清晰度、连贯性和相关性方面的看法。这些方面使用内容验证系数法进行分析,必须等于或大于0.70才能证明问卷的质量。结果表明,仪器各项目组成的总系数分别为0.87、0.94和0.95,证明了该仪器的质量。因此,本问卷可以用于组织诊断,这是一个机会,为未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construction and Content Validation of an instrument for assessment holistic Knowledge Management
ABSTRACT Knowledge Management is a field of research that seeks to articulate the intricate relationship between the various organizational dimensions that influence in favor of knowledge. Measurement, as a dimension of this management, proposes to measure the level or capacity of knowledge management in organizational locus. However, the instruments for this purpose are expressed without an apparent psychometric assessment, as well as they do not articulate the holistic perspective, embodied by the totality of the critical dimensions for the success of this management. In the meantime, this research aims to build and validate an instrument for assessing holistic Knowledge Management. So, this is descriptive research with a quantitative approach, which makes use of the perception of four expert judges concerning the aspects of clarity, coherence, and pertinence of the statements of the constructed instrument. These aspects were analyzed using the Content Validation Coefficient method and must be equal to or greater than 0.70 to certify the quality of the questionnaire. The results express that the total coefficients, composed of all instrument items, are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.95 for each aspect, respectively, attesting to the quality of that instrument. Thus, this questionnaire can be applied for purposes of organizational diagnosis, which is an opportunity for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao
Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Perspectivas en Ciencia de la Información es una publicación trimestral de la Escuela de Ciencia de la Información de la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais. Fue lanzada en 1996, en sustitución a la Revista de la Escuela de Biblioteconomía de la UFMG. Y en el caso de que se produzca un cambio en la calidad de la información y de la comunicación.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信