认识论霸权:学术出版中的西方束缚与后殖民伤痕

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
O. Noda
{"title":"认识论霸权:学术出版中的西方束缚与后殖民伤痕","authors":"O. Noda","doi":"10.1590/0034-7329202000107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of International Relations (IR) is barely ‘international’. Scholars have voiced their concerns and as a result, we have witnessed calls for diversity and inclusion in IR, be it in publication or in syllabi. Notwithstanding, the misrepresentation of non-Western scholars in the production of knowledge is significant. This article sheds light on the dynamics of publishing from a non-Western perspective and reinforces Post-Colonial epistemological critiques in IR. Based on the latest dataset from the International Studies Association (ISA)’s journals, this article argues that the current setting of IR journals is not suited for and receptive of non-Western scholars and epistemologies.","PeriodicalId":45317,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic hegemony: the Western straitjacket and post-colonial scars in academic publishing\",\"authors\":\"O. Noda\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7329202000107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of International Relations (IR) is barely ‘international’. Scholars have voiced their concerns and as a result, we have witnessed calls for diversity and inclusion in IR, be it in publication or in syllabi. Notwithstanding, the misrepresentation of non-Western scholars in the production of knowledge is significant. This article sheds light on the dynamics of publishing from a non-Western perspective and reinforces Post-Colonial epistemological critiques in IR. Based on the latest dataset from the International Studies Association (ISA)’s journals, this article argues that the current setting of IR journals is not suited for and receptive of non-Western scholars and epistemologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Politica Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

国际关系(IR)领域几乎不具有“国际性”。学者们表达了他们的担忧,因此,我们看到了对国际关系多样性和包容性的呼吁,无论是在出版物中还是在教学大纲中。尽管如此,非西方学者在知识生产方面的错误表述是很重要的。本文从非西方视角揭示了出版的动态,并加强了后殖民认识论对国际关系的批评。基于国际研究协会(ISA)期刊的最新数据集,本文认为当前的国际关系期刊设置不适合和接受非西方学者和认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic hegemony: the Western straitjacket and post-colonial scars in academic publishing
The field of International Relations (IR) is barely ‘international’. Scholars have voiced their concerns and as a result, we have witnessed calls for diversity and inclusion in IR, be it in publication or in syllabi. Notwithstanding, the misrepresentation of non-Western scholars in the production of knowledge is significant. This article sheds light on the dynamics of publishing from a non-Western perspective and reinforces Post-Colonial epistemological critiques in IR. Based on the latest dataset from the International Studies Association (ISA)’s journals, this article argues that the current setting of IR journals is not suited for and receptive of non-Western scholars and epistemologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信