宗教问题主教的大赦程序:史学、宪法和外交

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Jefferson de Almeida Pinto
{"title":"宗教问题主教的大赦程序:史学、宪法和外交","authors":"Jefferson de Almeida Pinto","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"426-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson de Almeida Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.15175/1984-2503-20168301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"426-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考虑了1875年,以及19世纪70年代帝国政治阵营成员之间关于是否可能赦免涉及所谓“宗教问题”的主教的辩论。基于“共济会与超蒙坦主义”的中心对立所驱动的主题的各种文本,这是当时政治-宗教冲突的主题,我们通过考虑帝国外交的反应来研究这一事态,从根本上说,宪法的逻辑,与国务委员会和其他来源的记录有关的辩论,在“宗教问题”最紧张的年份之前和期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia
This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信