{"title":"宗教问题主教的大赦程序:史学、宪法和外交","authors":"Jefferson de Almeida Pinto","doi":"10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.","PeriodicalId":41789,"journal":{"name":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","volume":"8 1","pages":"426-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia\",\"authors\":\"Jefferson de Almeida Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.15175/1984-2503-20168301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"426-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passagens-International Review of Political History and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-20168301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
O processo de anistia aos bispos da Questão Religiosa: Historiografia, Direito Constitucional e Diplomacia
This article considers the year 1875 and the debate among members of the imperial political camp on a possible amnesty for bishops involved in the so-called “Religious Question” in the 1870s. Based on various texts on the subject driven by a central antithesis of “Freemasonry versus Ultramontanism”, which was the main theme of political-religious conflicts at the time, we examine this state of affairs by considering the response by imperial diplomacy, and fundamentally, the logic of constitutional law, with the debate related in records for the Council of State and other sources, both prior to and during the most tense years of the “Religious Question”.