堕胎问题:新自由主义时代的个性化和法律化。

J. Brown
{"title":"堕胎问题:新自由主义时代的个性化和法律化。","authors":"J. Brown","doi":"10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based on theoretical analysis and empirical research on sexual and (non) reproductive rights on the intersection between sociopolitical discourses and individual experiences. The main objective is to understand the impediments on public and political debates on abortion in Argentina, and in Latin America more broadly, associating them to political processes of individualization and juridification/judicialisation of social problems in neoliberal contexts. The proposed hypothesis highlights the complexities underlyng the neoliberal concept of individuality vis-a-vis the same concept in the “organized society”, as well as the specific difficulties regarding sexualities which emerge from the emphasis on a biomedical discourse instead of a juridical one. It is required of the neoliberal individual: conscience, will, freedom, and especially responsibility (updating the classical liberal notion of individuality). In the case of abortion, these new social demands translate into an intolerance towards what is conceived as a “mistake” or an inability to prevent risks in the exercise of a sexuality which must be free, voluntary, consensual, responsible and pleasurable.","PeriodicalId":30255,"journal":{"name":"Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad Revista Latinoamericana","volume":"1 1","pages":"16-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El aborto en cuestión: la individuación y juridificación en tiempos de neoliberalismos.\",\"authors\":\"J. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is based on theoretical analysis and empirical research on sexual and (non) reproductive rights on the intersection between sociopolitical discourses and individual experiences. The main objective is to understand the impediments on public and political debates on abortion in Argentina, and in Latin America more broadly, associating them to political processes of individualization and juridification/judicialisation of social problems in neoliberal contexts. The proposed hypothesis highlights the complexities underlyng the neoliberal concept of individuality vis-a-vis the same concept in the “organized society”, as well as the specific difficulties regarding sexualities which emerge from the emphasis on a biomedical discourse instead of a juridical one. It is required of the neoliberal individual: conscience, will, freedom, and especially responsibility (updating the classical liberal notion of individuality). In the case of abortion, these new social demands translate into an intolerance towards what is conceived as a “mistake” or an inability to prevent risks in the exercise of a sexuality which must be free, voluntary, consensual, responsible and pleasurable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad Revista Latinoamericana\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"16-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad Revista Latinoamericana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad Revista Latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.SESS.2016.24.02.A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文以社会政治话语与个人经验的交叉点为基础,对性权利与(非)生殖权利进行理论分析与实证研究。主要目标是了解阿根廷和更广泛的拉丁美洲关于堕胎的公共和政治辩论的障碍,将它们与新自由主义背景下社会问题的个体化和合法化/司法化的政治进程联系起来。所提出的假设突出了新自由主义的个性概念相对于“有组织的社会”中的相同概念的复杂性,以及强调生物医学话语而不是法律话语所产生的关于性行为的具体困难。这是新自由主义个人的要求:良知、意志、自由,尤其是责任(更新了古典自由主义的个性概念)。在堕胎问题上,这些新的社会要求转化为对被认为是“错误”的行为的不容忍,或无法预防必须是自由、自愿、双方同意、负责任和令人愉快的性行为的危险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El aborto en cuestión: la individuación y juridificación en tiempos de neoliberalismos.
This paper is based on theoretical analysis and empirical research on sexual and (non) reproductive rights on the intersection between sociopolitical discourses and individual experiences. The main objective is to understand the impediments on public and political debates on abortion in Argentina, and in Latin America more broadly, associating them to political processes of individualization and juridification/judicialisation of social problems in neoliberal contexts. The proposed hypothesis highlights the complexities underlyng the neoliberal concept of individuality vis-a-vis the same concept in the “organized society”, as well as the specific difficulties regarding sexualities which emerge from the emphasis on a biomedical discourse instead of a juridical one. It is required of the neoliberal individual: conscience, will, freedom, and especially responsibility (updating the classical liberal notion of individuality). In the case of abortion, these new social demands translate into an intolerance towards what is conceived as a “mistake” or an inability to prevent risks in the exercise of a sexuality which must be free, voluntary, consensual, responsible and pleasurable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信