口头报告和孕妇卡上的记录之间的差异,一个被忽视的工具

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fabiano Barreto, R. M. Albuquerque
{"title":"口头报告和孕妇卡上的记录之间的差异,一个被忽视的工具","authors":"Fabiano Barreto, R. M. Albuquerque","doi":"10.1590/S0100-72032012000600004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To compare the filling out of the prenatal care card of pregnant women at a school-service and other services, as well as to verify the concordance between these records and verbal information provided by the puerperae. METHODS: A two-stage epidemiological, cross-sectional study was performed with stratified sampling, proportional to number of births. In the first stage, the information recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was compared to that recorded in units not linked to higher health education in Recife (PE). In the second stage, the information about prenatal care was collected with a semi-structured questionnaire applied to women during the puerperal period. A total of 262 puerperae older than 19 years, who had a prenatal care card at the time of delivery were included in the study from May to July 2008. Data were analyzed statistically by the χ2 test, Student´s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, all one-sided to the right, with the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The information more often recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was: schooling (86.5 versus 70.3%; p=0.002), marital status, (83.7 versus 70.9%; p=0.01), weight prior to pregnancy (72.1 versus 46.8%; p<0.001), height (62.5 versus 45.6%; p=0.007), and educational practices (76.9 versus 11.4%; p<0.001) and, at other services, only birth weight <2,500 g (15.4 versus 27.2% at the school-service; p=0.02). There were significant discrepancies between data obtained by verbal information and the prenatal care records of the pregnant women. At the school-service, 40.3% of pregnant women received adequate prenatal care versus 20.3% at other units. CONCLUSIONS: In all services, there was a predominance of recorded information directly related to delivery, while information about actions with preventive characteristics during prenatal care was neglected.","PeriodicalId":47257,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepâncias entre o informe verbal e os registros no cartão da gestante, um instrumento negligenciado\",\"authors\":\"Fabiano Barreto, R. M. Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0100-72032012000600004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: To compare the filling out of the prenatal care card of pregnant women at a school-service and other services, as well as to verify the concordance between these records and verbal information provided by the puerperae. METHODS: A two-stage epidemiological, cross-sectional study was performed with stratified sampling, proportional to number of births. In the first stage, the information recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was compared to that recorded in units not linked to higher health education in Recife (PE). In the second stage, the information about prenatal care was collected with a semi-structured questionnaire applied to women during the puerperal period. A total of 262 puerperae older than 19 years, who had a prenatal care card at the time of delivery were included in the study from May to July 2008. Data were analyzed statistically by the χ2 test, Student´s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, all one-sided to the right, with the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The information more often recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was: schooling (86.5 versus 70.3%; p=0.002), marital status, (83.7 versus 70.9%; p=0.01), weight prior to pregnancy (72.1 versus 46.8%; p<0.001), height (62.5 versus 45.6%; p=0.007), and educational practices (76.9 versus 11.4%; p<0.001) and, at other services, only birth weight <2,500 g (15.4 versus 27.2% at the school-service; p=0.02). There were significant discrepancies between data obtained by verbal information and the prenatal care records of the pregnant women. At the school-service, 40.3% of pregnant women received adequate prenatal care versus 20.3% at other units. CONCLUSIONS: In all services, there was a predominance of recorded information directly related to delivery, while information about actions with preventive characteristics during prenatal care was neglected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032012000600004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032012000600004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:比较学校服务和其他服务机构孕妇产前护理卡填写情况,并验证这些记录与产妇口头提供的信息的一致性。方法:采用分层抽样,按出生人数成比例进行两阶段流行病学横断面研究。在第一阶段,将学校服务部门产前护理卡上记录的信息与累西腓(PE)与高等卫生教育无关的单位记录的信息进行比较。在第二阶段,收集产前护理的信息,采用半结构化的问卷调查妇女在产褥期。2008年5月至7月期间,共有262名年龄在19岁以上、在分娩时有产前护理卡的产妇被纳入研究。数据采用χ2检验、Student’st检验或Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析,均为单侧向右,显著性水平设为5%。结果:学校服务处产前保健卡上记录的信息较多的是:在校(86.5% vs 70.3%);P =0.002)、婚姻状况(83.7 vs 70.9%;P =0.01)、孕前体重(72.1%对46.8%;P <0.001)、身高(62.5% vs 45.6%;P =0.007)和教育实践(76.9 vs 11.4%;P <0.001),而在其他服务中,只有出生体重<2,500 g(15.4%对27.2%的学校服务;p = 0.02)。通过口头信息获得的数据与孕妇的产前护理记录存在显著差异。在学校服务部门,40.3%的孕妇得到充分的产前护理,而在其他单位,这一比例为20.3%。结论:在所有服务中,与分娩直接相关的记录信息占主导地位,而产前护理中具有预防特征的行动信息被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrepâncias entre o informe verbal e os registros no cartão da gestante, um instrumento negligenciado
PURPOSE: To compare the filling out of the prenatal care card of pregnant women at a school-service and other services, as well as to verify the concordance between these records and verbal information provided by the puerperae. METHODS: A two-stage epidemiological, cross-sectional study was performed with stratified sampling, proportional to number of births. In the first stage, the information recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was compared to that recorded in units not linked to higher health education in Recife (PE). In the second stage, the information about prenatal care was collected with a semi-structured questionnaire applied to women during the puerperal period. A total of 262 puerperae older than 19 years, who had a prenatal care card at the time of delivery were included in the study from May to July 2008. Data were analyzed statistically by the χ2 test, Student´s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, all one-sided to the right, with the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: The information more often recorded on the prenatal care card in the school-service was: schooling (86.5 versus 70.3%; p=0.002), marital status, (83.7 versus 70.9%; p=0.01), weight prior to pregnancy (72.1 versus 46.8%; p<0.001), height (62.5 versus 45.6%; p=0.007), and educational practices (76.9 versus 11.4%; p<0.001) and, at other services, only birth weight <2,500 g (15.4 versus 27.2% at the school-service; p=0.02). There were significant discrepancies between data obtained by verbal information and the prenatal care records of the pregnant women. At the school-service, 40.3% of pregnant women received adequate prenatal care versus 20.3% at other units. CONCLUSIONS: In all services, there was a predominance of recorded information directly related to delivery, while information about actions with preventive characteristics during prenatal care was neglected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, ISSN 1806-9339) is a monthly publication of scientific divulgation of the Federação das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). It is directed to obstetricians, gynecologists and professionals of related areas, with the purpose of publishing research results on relevant topics in the field of Gynecology, Obstetrics and related areas. It is open to national and international contributions and the journal receives submissions only in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信