策略作为社会实践:策略制作中的话语实践研究

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Almerinda Tereza Bianca Bez Batti Dias, C. Rossetto, Sidnei Vieira Marinho
{"title":"策略作为社会实践:策略制作中的话语实践研究","authors":"Almerinda Tereza Bianca Bez Batti Dias, C. Rossetto, Sidnei Vieira Marinho","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted using a contemporary approach of Strategy as Social Practice (SSP) highlighting discursive practices. This research aimed to understand how discursive practices contributed to a community higher education institution’s strategic practices. We adopted a qualitative approach as suggested by the literature for research in SSP. We chose to do a single case study and collected data through systematic observation of five strategic planning meetings, qualitative interviews with managers at five hierarchical levels of the university, and document analysis. We used Peircean semiotic analysis for data analysis (Dias, 2015). Based on this analysis, we determined what contributed to strategizing: the historical and social context; a power relationship between the academic area strategists and a means, which is implicit in the discursive practices. The voices of practitioners also emerged from the data: leader, manager and external consultant. From the SSP perspective, the decision-making process may have brought limitations since the one hundred and eleven strategists did not participate in all stages of planning, especially in terms of the means.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"21 1","pages":"393-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estratégia como Prática Social: um Estudo de Práticas Discursivas no Fazer Estratégia\",\"authors\":\"Almerinda Tereza Bianca Bez Batti Dias, C. Rossetto, Sidnei Vieira Marinho\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted using a contemporary approach of Strategy as Social Practice (SSP) highlighting discursive practices. This research aimed to understand how discursive practices contributed to a community higher education institution’s strategic practices. We adopted a qualitative approach as suggested by the literature for research in SSP. We chose to do a single case study and collected data through systematic observation of five strategic planning meetings, qualitative interviews with managers at five hierarchical levels of the university, and document analysis. We used Peircean semiotic analysis for data analysis (Dias, 2015). Based on this analysis, we determined what contributed to strategizing: the historical and social context; a power relationship between the academic area strategists and a means, which is implicit in the discursive practices. The voices of practitioners also emerged from the data: leader, manager and external consultant. From the SSP perspective, the decision-making process may have brought limitations since the one hundred and eleven strategists did not participate in all stages of planning, especially in terms of the means.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"393-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2017160095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究采用当代战略作为社会实践(SSP)的方法进行,强调话语实践。本研究旨在了解话语实践如何促进社区高等教育机构的战略实践。我们采用了文献建议的定性方法来研究SSP。我们选择做一个单一的案例研究,并通过系统地观察五次战略规划会议,对大学五个层次的管理者进行定性访谈,以及文献分析来收集数据。我们使用Peircean符号学分析进行数据分析(Dias, 2015)。基于这一分析,我们确定了促成战略的因素:历史和社会背景;学术领域战略家与手段之间的权力关系,隐含在话语实践中。从业者的声音也从数据中浮现出来:领导者、管理者和外部顾问。从战略战略计划的角度来看,决策过程可能会带来局限性,因为111名战略家没有参与规划的所有阶段,特别是在手段方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estratégia como Prática Social: um Estudo de Práticas Discursivas no Fazer Estratégia
This study was conducted using a contemporary approach of Strategy as Social Practice (SSP) highlighting discursive practices. This research aimed to understand how discursive practices contributed to a community higher education institution’s strategic practices. We adopted a qualitative approach as suggested by the literature for research in SSP. We chose to do a single case study and collected data through systematic observation of five strategic planning meetings, qualitative interviews with managers at five hierarchical levels of the university, and document analysis. We used Peircean semiotic analysis for data analysis (Dias, 2015). Based on this analysis, we determined what contributed to strategizing: the historical and social context; a power relationship between the academic area strategists and a means, which is implicit in the discursive practices. The voices of practitioners also emerged from the data: leader, manager and external consultant. From the SSP perspective, the decision-making process may have brought limitations since the one hundred and eleven strategists did not participate in all stages of planning, especially in terms of the means.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信