A. C. Francischini, J. Constantin, W. D. Matte, Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Júnior, R. Mendes, F. G. Machado
{"title":"棉秆化学防治后的退种期","authors":"A. C. Francischini, J. Constantin, W. D. Matte, Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Júnior, R. Mendes, F. G. Machado","doi":"10.1590/1808-1657000392020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arq. Inst. Biol., v.88, 1-12, e00392020, 2021 ABSTRACT A very limited amount of information is available in relation both to the residual effect of herbicides destinated to the destruction of cotton stalks and to the time interval required to prevent that development and yield of the following crop be affected. This work aimed to identify the residual activity of herbicides intended to eliminate cotton stalks and to estimate the safety interval (SI) of time for the next cotton sowing. Two trails were simultaneously carried out, the first one for a single application and a second one for the two sequential applications of herbicide treatments, in a 15×5 factorial design organized in randomized complete blocks with four replications. Levels of first factor were constituted by herbicide treatments and the levels of the second factor were composed five periods of time for cotton sowing after herbicide application (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days). Herbicides were 2,4-D, glyphosate, saflufenacil, [imazapic + imazapyr], dicamba, fluroxypyr and sulfentrazone. Results provided an indication of residual activity of herbicide treatments in soil and indicated that a single application or two sequential applications of glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil have a considerable potential to affect cotton and a period exceeding 100 days for a single application and exceeding 120 days for two sequential applications was necessary. Treatments with 2,4-D and 2,4-D + glyphosate provided the shortest safe interval and may be used for cotton stalk destruction with no risks for the crop sowing after the withdrawal period.","PeriodicalId":30679,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos do Instituto Biologico","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Withdrawal period for seeding cotton after chemical control of cotton stalks\",\"authors\":\"A. C. Francischini, J. Constantin, W. D. Matte, Rubem Silvério de Oliveira Júnior, R. Mendes, F. G. Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1808-1657000392020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arq. Inst. Biol., v.88, 1-12, e00392020, 2021 ABSTRACT A very limited amount of information is available in relation both to the residual effect of herbicides destinated to the destruction of cotton stalks and to the time interval required to prevent that development and yield of the following crop be affected. This work aimed to identify the residual activity of herbicides intended to eliminate cotton stalks and to estimate the safety interval (SI) of time for the next cotton sowing. Two trails were simultaneously carried out, the first one for a single application and a second one for the two sequential applications of herbicide treatments, in a 15×5 factorial design organized in randomized complete blocks with four replications. Levels of first factor were constituted by herbicide treatments and the levels of the second factor were composed five periods of time for cotton sowing after herbicide application (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days). Herbicides were 2,4-D, glyphosate, saflufenacil, [imazapic + imazapyr], dicamba, fluroxypyr and sulfentrazone. Results provided an indication of residual activity of herbicide treatments in soil and indicated that a single application or two sequential applications of glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil have a considerable potential to affect cotton and a period exceeding 100 days for a single application and exceeding 120 days for two sequential applications was necessary. Treatments with 2,4-D and 2,4-D + glyphosate provided the shortest safe interval and may be used for cotton stalk destruction with no risks for the crop sowing after the withdrawal period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos do Instituto Biologico\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos do Instituto Biologico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000392020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos do Instituto Biologico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000392020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Arq。本月,杂志。摘要关于除草剂对棉花秸秆的残留效应,以及防止后续作物发育和产量受到影响所需的时间间隔,现有的信息非常有限。本研究的目的是确定用于去除棉秆的除草剂的残留活性,并估计下一次棉花播种的安全间隔时间。同时进行两项试验,第一项为单次施用,第二项为两次连续施用除草剂处理,在15×5因子设计中组织随机完整块,有四个重复。第一个因子的水平由除草剂处理组成,第二个因子的水平由除草剂施用后棉花播种5个时间段(0、30、60、90和120 d)组成。除草剂为2,4- d、草甘膦、氟虫腈、伊马吡嗪+伊马吡嗪、麦草畏、氟虫腈和磺胺曲酮。结果表明,草甘膦+麦草畏+氟虫腈单次施用或连续两次施用对棉花有相当大的潜在影响,单次施用超过100天,连续两次施用超过120天是必要的。2,4- d和2,4- d +草甘膦处理提供了最短的安全间隔,可用于棉花秸秆的破坏,对作物在退出期后的播种没有风险。
Withdrawal period for seeding cotton after chemical control of cotton stalks
Arq. Inst. Biol., v.88, 1-12, e00392020, 2021 ABSTRACT A very limited amount of information is available in relation both to the residual effect of herbicides destinated to the destruction of cotton stalks and to the time interval required to prevent that development and yield of the following crop be affected. This work aimed to identify the residual activity of herbicides intended to eliminate cotton stalks and to estimate the safety interval (SI) of time for the next cotton sowing. Two trails were simultaneously carried out, the first one for a single application and a second one for the two sequential applications of herbicide treatments, in a 15×5 factorial design organized in randomized complete blocks with four replications. Levels of first factor were constituted by herbicide treatments and the levels of the second factor were composed five periods of time for cotton sowing after herbicide application (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days). Herbicides were 2,4-D, glyphosate, saflufenacil, [imazapic + imazapyr], dicamba, fluroxypyr and sulfentrazone. Results provided an indication of residual activity of herbicide treatments in soil and indicated that a single application or two sequential applications of glyphosate + dicamba + saflufenacil have a considerable potential to affect cotton and a period exceeding 100 days for a single application and exceeding 120 days for two sequential applications was necessary. Treatments with 2,4-D and 2,4-D + glyphosate provided the shortest safe interval and may be used for cotton stalk destruction with no risks for the crop sowing after the withdrawal period.