巴西立法选举中的极端不可行候选人和配额操纵

Q3 Social Sciences
Kristin Wylie, Pedro dos Santos, Daniel Marcelino
{"title":"巴西立法选举中的极端不可行候选人和配额操纵","authors":"Kristin Wylie, Pedro dos Santos, Daniel Marcelino","doi":"10.1590/1807-019120192511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the causes and consequences of extreme non-viable candidacies, also known as “ laranja ” (orange) candidacies in the Brazilian political lore. We first define and delineate what makes a candidate a laranja, engaging the comparative literature on sacrificial lambs and using district-level electoral results to operationalize the concept. We then advance a typology of laranjas with four ideal types that vary along dimensions of legality and intentionality. Next, we apply descriptive statistics and a hierarchical logistic regression model to explore the individual, party, and district-level characteristics of extreme non-viable candidates and assess whether and how laranjas are distinct from non- laranjas. Finally, we illustrate the gendered character of laranjas, documenting how the candidate gender quota law in Brazil has been associated with a proliferation of candidatas laranjas (women extreme non-viable candidates).","PeriodicalId":35314,"journal":{"name":"Opiniao Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-019120192511","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme non-viable candidates and quota maneuvering in Brazilian legislative elections\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Wylie, Pedro dos Santos, Daniel Marcelino\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-019120192511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the causes and consequences of extreme non-viable candidacies, also known as “ laranja ” (orange) candidacies in the Brazilian political lore. We first define and delineate what makes a candidate a laranja, engaging the comparative literature on sacrificial lambs and using district-level electoral results to operationalize the concept. We then advance a typology of laranjas with four ideal types that vary along dimensions of legality and intentionality. Next, we apply descriptive statistics and a hierarchical logistic regression model to explore the individual, party, and district-level characteristics of extreme non-viable candidates and assess whether and how laranjas are distinct from non- laranjas. Finally, we illustrate the gendered character of laranjas, documenting how the candidate gender quota law in Brazil has been associated with a proliferation of candidatas laranjas (women extreme non-viable candidates).\",\"PeriodicalId\":35314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1807-019120192511\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opiniao Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-019120192511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opiniao Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-019120192511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文探讨了极端不可行候选人的原因和后果,在巴西政坛也被称为“laranja”(橙色)候选人。我们首先定义和描述是什么使候选人成为laranja,参与关于牺牲羔羊的比较文献,并使用地区一级的选举结果来操作这一概念。然后,我们提出了一种具有四种理想类型的laranjas的类型学,这些类型沿着合法性和意向性的维度变化。接下来,我们应用描述性统计和层次逻辑回归模型来探索极端不可生存候选人的个人、政党和地区层面特征,并评估laranjas与非laranjas是否不同以及如何不同。最后,我们说明了laranjas的性别特征,记录了巴西候选人性别配额法是如何与候选人laranjas(极端不可行的女性候选人)的激增联系在一起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extreme non-viable candidates and quota maneuvering in Brazilian legislative elections
This article explores the causes and consequences of extreme non-viable candidacies, also known as “ laranja ” (orange) candidacies in the Brazilian political lore. We first define and delineate what makes a candidate a laranja, engaging the comparative literature on sacrificial lambs and using district-level electoral results to operationalize the concept. We then advance a typology of laranjas with four ideal types that vary along dimensions of legality and intentionality. Next, we apply descriptive statistics and a hierarchical logistic regression model to explore the individual, party, and district-level characteristics of extreme non-viable candidates and assess whether and how laranjas are distinct from non- laranjas. Finally, we illustrate the gendered character of laranjas, documenting how the candidate gender quota law in Brazil has been associated with a proliferation of candidatas laranjas (women extreme non-viable candidates).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Opiniao Publica
Opiniao Publica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Opinião Pública is quadrimestral publication of the Center for Studies on Public Opinion (CESOP) of the University fo Campinas, Brazil Created in 1993, its main objective is to establish a specialized academic vehicle to publish articles about theory and methodology in the field of public opinion, political and social behavior, and midia studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信