自闭症谱系障碍的警告信号:PROTEA-R-NV有效性的证据

Q4 Psychology

Avaliacao Psicologica Pub Date : 2021-08-15 DOI:10.15689/ap.2021.2003.19847.07

Bibiana Gallas Steigleder, C. A. Bosa, Juliana Burges Sbicigo

{"title":"自闭症谱系障碍的警告信号:PROTEA-R-NV有效性的证据","authors":"Bibiana Gallas Steigleder, C. A. Bosa, Juliana Burges Sbicigo","doi":"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.19847.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early Signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Validity Evidence of the PROTEA-R-NV Identification of signs of ASD and diagnosis require the use of tests with diverse sources of validity evidence. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the PROTEA-R-NV based on: (a) criteria variables and (b) convergent validity with the M-CHAT. A mixed method design was performed (comparative and correlational groups). In the comparative analysis, 15 children diagnosed with ASD (mean age 44.8 (SD=16.64) months) and 15 children without this diagnosis (mean age 45.13 (SD=17.62) months) participated. Participants in the correlational analysis were 44 children with and without ASD (mean age 45.10(SD=15.90) months). The majority of PROTEA-R-NV items and the total score of the critical items showed significant differences between groups, with the ASD group presenting higher scores, indicating more impairment. The M-CHAT total score showed strong and positive correlation with the PROTEA-R-NV critical items score. Accordingly, the PROTEA-R-NV presented adequate evidence of validity based on criteria and convergent validity.","PeriodicalId":37995,"journal":{"name":"Avaliacao Psicologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sinais de Alerta para Transtorno do Espectro Autista: Evidências de Validade do PROTEA-R-NV\",\"authors\":\"Bibiana Gallas Steigleder, C. A. Bosa, Juliana Burges Sbicigo\",\"doi\":\"10.15689/ap.2021.2003.19847.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early Signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Validity Evidence of the PROTEA-R-NV Identification of signs of ASD and diagnosis require the use of tests with diverse sources of validity evidence. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the PROTEA-R-NV based on: (a) criteria variables and (b) convergent validity with the M-CHAT. A mixed method design was performed (comparative and correlational groups). In the comparative analysis, 15 children diagnosed with ASD (mean age 44.8 (SD=16.64) months) and 15 children without this diagnosis (mean age 45.13 (SD=17.62) months) participated. Participants in the correlational analysis were 44 children with and without ASD (mean age 45.10(SD=15.90) months). The majority of PROTEA-R-NV items and the total score of the critical items showed significant differences between groups, with the ASD group presenting higher scores, indicating more impairment. The M-CHAT total score showed strong and positive correlation with the PROTEA-R-NV critical items score. Accordingly, the PROTEA-R-NV presented adequate evidence of validity based on criteria and convergent validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.19847.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliacao Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.19847.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍的早期迹象:PROTEA-R-NV的有效性证据识别自闭症谱系障碍的迹象和诊断需要使用具有不同有效性证据来源的测试。本研究的目的是根据:(a)标准变量和(b) M-CHAT的收敛效度来收集PROTEA-R-NV的效度证据。采用混合方法设计(比较组和相关组)。在比较分析中，15名诊断为ASD的儿童(平均年龄44.8 (SD=16.64)个月)和15名未诊断为ASD的儿童(平均年龄45.13 (SD=17.62)个月)参与了研究。相关分析的参与者为44名有或无ASD的儿童(平均年龄45.10(SD=15.90)个月)。PROTEA-R-NV大部分项目及关键项目总分组间差异有统计学意义，ASD组得分较高，表明功能障碍较多。M-CHAT总分与PROTEA-R-NV关键项得分呈显著正相关。因此，PROTEA-R-NV基于标准和收敛效度提供了充分的效度证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Sinais de Alerta para Transtorno do Espectro Autista: Evidências de Validade do PROTEA-R-NV

Early Signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Validity Evidence of the PROTEA-R-NV Identification of signs of ASD and diagnosis require the use of tests with diverse sources of validity evidence. The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the PROTEA-R-NV based on: (a) criteria variables and (b) convergent validity with the M-CHAT. A mixed method design was performed (comparative and correlational groups). In the comparative analysis, 15 children diagnosed with ASD (mean age 44.8 (SD=16.64) months) and 15 children without this diagnosis (mean age 45.13 (SD=17.62) months) participated. Participants in the correlational analysis were 44 children with and without ASD (mean age 45.10(SD=15.90) months). The majority of PROTEA-R-NV items and the total score of the critical items showed significant differences between groups, with the ASD group presenting higher scores, indicating more impairment. The M-CHAT total score showed strong and positive correlation with the PROTEA-R-NV critical items score. Accordingly, the PROTEA-R-NV presented adequate evidence of validity based on criteria and convergent validity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Avaliacao Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

34 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal Avaliação Psicológica - Official Publication of the Brazilian Institute of Psychological Assessment (IBAP). This journal is a quarterly publication, it is also a vehicle for the dissemination of scientific Ibero-American area of psychological and educational assessment. Its objective is to divulge the advances of the theory, searches and practical in the area of the evaluation in Psychology, Education, Counseling, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources and others related disciplines. The publishing process aims to present to the scientific community a text that reflects a significant and actualize contribution. Publishes original papers, preferably research reports, but also the literature review articles, technical notes and short reports of research, book reviews and news on the topic.