Zulliger的R优化应用:抑郁症患者的有效性证据

Q4 Psychology
A. Gonçalves, Ana Carolina Zuanazzi, Anna Elisa Villemor-Amaral
{"title":"Zulliger的R优化应用:抑郁症患者的有效性证据","authors":"A. Gonçalves, Ana Carolina Zuanazzi, Anna Elisa Villemor-Amaral","doi":"10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16215.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"R-Optimized Administration in Zulliger: Validity Evidence for Depressive Patients The proposal of administrating Zulliger controlling the number of responses (R-Optimized) was never tried and it is necessary to verify empirically its validity evidences, our aim in this study. For this, 39 subjects were recruited, with a primary diagnosis of depression and minimal symptomatology within the light classification. The Baptist Depression Scale (EBADEP-A) was used to verify the symptomatologic level and, afterwards, the Zulliger and Rorschach tests were applied alternately to control the effect of one instrument on the other. For the analyzes, the variables related to depression of both instruments were selected according to previous literature. The results demonstrated initial evidence of validity for some variables related to depression, improving the correlation between them, when compared to previous studies in which the number of responses in Zulliger was not controlled. Further studies on Zulliger using R-optimized application are needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":37995,"journal":{"name":"Avaliacao Psicologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aplicação R-Otimizada no Zulliger: evidências de validade com pacientes depressivos\",\"authors\":\"A. Gonçalves, Ana Carolina Zuanazzi, Anna Elisa Villemor-Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16215.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"R-Optimized Administration in Zulliger: Validity Evidence for Depressive Patients The proposal of administrating Zulliger controlling the number of responses (R-Optimized) was never tried and it is necessary to verify empirically its validity evidences, our aim in this study. For this, 39 subjects were recruited, with a primary diagnosis of depression and minimal symptomatology within the light classification. The Baptist Depression Scale (EBADEP-A) was used to verify the symptomatologic level and, afterwards, the Zulliger and Rorschach tests were applied alternately to control the effect of one instrument on the other. For the analyzes, the variables related to depression of both instruments were selected according to previous literature. The results demonstrated initial evidence of validity for some variables related to depression, improving the correlation between them, when compared to previous studies in which the number of responses in Zulliger was not controlled. Further studies on Zulliger using R-optimized application are needed to confirm these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avaliacao Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16215.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliacao Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2019.1802.16215.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Zulliger的r优化给药:抑郁症患者的效度证据从未被尝试过,有必要对其效度证据进行实证验证,这是我们本研究的目的。为此,招募了39名受试者,初步诊断为抑郁症,轻度分类中症状最小。浸礼会抑郁量表(EBADEP-A)用于验证症状水平,然后交替应用Zulliger和Rorschach测试来控制一种工具对另一种工具的影响。为了进行分析,我们根据之前的文献选择了与两种工具抑郁相关的变量。与之前的研究相比,结果显示了一些与抑郁症相关的变量的有效性的初步证据,改善了它们之间的相关性,而之前的研究中Zulliger的反应数量是不受控制的。需要进一步使用r优化应用对Zulliger进行研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aplicação R-Otimizada no Zulliger: evidências de validade com pacientes depressivos
R-Optimized Administration in Zulliger: Validity Evidence for Depressive Patients The proposal of administrating Zulliger controlling the number of responses (R-Optimized) was never tried and it is necessary to verify empirically its validity evidences, our aim in this study. For this, 39 subjects were recruited, with a primary diagnosis of depression and minimal symptomatology within the light classification. The Baptist Depression Scale (EBADEP-A) was used to verify the symptomatologic level and, afterwards, the Zulliger and Rorschach tests were applied alternately to control the effect of one instrument on the other. For the analyzes, the variables related to depression of both instruments were selected according to previous literature. The results demonstrated initial evidence of validity for some variables related to depression, improving the correlation between them, when compared to previous studies in which the number of responses in Zulliger was not controlled. Further studies on Zulliger using R-optimized application are needed to confirm these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avaliacao Psicologica
Avaliacao Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Avaliação Psicológica - Official Publication of the Brazilian Institute of Psychological Assessment (IBAP). This journal is a quarterly publication, it is also a vehicle for the dissemination of scientific Ibero-American area of psychological and educational assessment. Its objective is to divulge the advances of the theory, searches and practical in the area of the evaluation in Psychology, Education, Counseling, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources and others related disciplines. The publishing process aims to present to the scientific community a text that reflects a significant and actualize contribution. Publishes original papers, preferably research reports, but also the literature review articles, technical notes and short reports of research, book reviews and news on the topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信