基于工程设计过程的论证工具开发,提高学生的论证能力

Q4 Social Sciences
P. Putra, N. Ahmad, A. S. Budiarso, Indrawati, Erika Ananda Lestari
{"title":"基于工程设计过程的论证工具开发,提高学生的论证能力","authors":"P. Putra, N. Ahmad, A. S. Budiarso, Indrawati, Erika Ananda Lestari","doi":"10.15804/tner.23.71.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentation skills play a vital role in students’ ability to master the learning process because, by employing these skills, they can explain real-world phenomena scientifically. This research focused on developing an argumentation tool based on the engineering design process (EDP) to improve students’ argumentation skills in science classrooms. This study utilised the research methods outlined by Plomp & Nieveen, which include problem identification, design, and implementation stages. This study, which involved 150 junior high school student participants, was conducted to implement the argumentation tool as a learning material to help students to understand heat transfer information in science learning. The indicators of argumentation skills included claims, evidence, and reasoning. The study results showed that five experts validated the argumentation tool in science learning development as appropriate for implementation as a practical tool in the science learning classroom. Furthermore, students’ argumentation skills improved significantly, mainly related to developing claims and collecting evidence based on the N-gain evaluation.","PeriodicalId":19430,"journal":{"name":"New Educational Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Argumentation Tools Based on the Engineering Design Process to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills\",\"authors\":\"P. Putra, N. Ahmad, A. S. Budiarso, Indrawati, Erika Ananda Lestari\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/tner.23.71.1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argumentation skills play a vital role in students’ ability to master the learning process because, by employing these skills, they can explain real-world phenomena scientifically. This research focused on developing an argumentation tool based on the engineering design process (EDP) to improve students’ argumentation skills in science classrooms. This study utilised the research methods outlined by Plomp & Nieveen, which include problem identification, design, and implementation stages. This study, which involved 150 junior high school student participants, was conducted to implement the argumentation tool as a learning material to help students to understand heat transfer information in science learning. The indicators of argumentation skills included claims, evidence, and reasoning. The study results showed that five experts validated the argumentation tool in science learning development as appropriate for implementation as a practical tool in the science learning classroom. Furthermore, students’ argumentation skills improved significantly, mainly related to developing claims and collecting evidence based on the N-gain evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Educational Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Educational Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.71.1.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.71.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

论证技能在学生掌握学习过程的能力中起着至关重要的作用,因为通过运用这些技能,他们可以科学地解释现实世界的现象。本研究旨在开发一种基于工程设计过程(EDP)的论证工具,以提高学生在科学课堂中的论证能力。本研究采用了Plomp & nievenen概述的研究方法,包括问题识别、设计和实施阶段。本研究以150名初中生为研究对象,将论证工具作为学习材料,帮助学生在科学学习中理解传热信息。论证技巧的指标包括主张、证据和推理。研究结果显示,五位专家验证了科学学习发展中的论证工具适合作为一种实用工具在科学学习课堂中实施。此外,学生的论证能力显著提高,主要涉及到基于n -增益评估的提出主张和收集证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Argumentation Tools Based on the Engineering Design Process to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills
Argumentation skills play a vital role in students’ ability to master the learning process because, by employing these skills, they can explain real-world phenomena scientifically. This research focused on developing an argumentation tool based on the engineering design process (EDP) to improve students’ argumentation skills in science classrooms. This study utilised the research methods outlined by Plomp & Nieveen, which include problem identification, design, and implementation stages. This study, which involved 150 junior high school student participants, was conducted to implement the argumentation tool as a learning material to help students to understand heat transfer information in science learning. The indicators of argumentation skills included claims, evidence, and reasoning. The study results showed that five experts validated the argumentation tool in science learning development as appropriate for implementation as a practical tool in the science learning classroom. Furthermore, students’ argumentation skills improved significantly, mainly related to developing claims and collecting evidence based on the N-gain evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Educational Review
New Educational Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The New Educational Review is a journal that has been founded by the faculties of education from the following universities: University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland), Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica (Slovak Republic) and University of Ostrava (Czech Republic). The deans and vice-deans of the pedagogical faculties of the universities mentioned above create associate Editors board. The main seat of editorial board is placed at the Faculty of Education and Psychology in University of Silesia in Poland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信