乔姆斯基的普遍语法:以其政府概念/约束理论为例

Q2 Social Sciences

Teflin Journal Pub Date : 2015-09-03 DOI:10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222

Y. Harsono

{"title":"乔姆斯基的普遍语法:以其政府概念/约束理论为例","authors":"Y. Harsono","doi":"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.","PeriodicalId":37036,"journal":{"name":"Teflin Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"210-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory\",\"authors\":\"Y. Harsono\",\"doi\":\"10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"210-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teflin Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teflin Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V12I2/210-222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是在政府、亲降参数和约束理论的概念中看到政府/约束理论的普遍性。基于这三个概念分析了英语、印度尼西亚语和爪哇语三种语言。从分析中可以得出结论，在某些情况下，语言是通用的，但在其他情况下，每种语言都是特定的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Chomsky's Universal Grammar: A Case of Its Concepts of Government/Binding Theory

The purpose of this paper is to see the universality of the Government/Binding Theory in its concepts of government, the pro-drop parameter, and binding theory. Three languages English, Indonesian, and Javanese are analyzed based on the three concepts. From the analysis it is concluded that in some cases language is universal, but in some other cases every language is specific.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Teflin Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks