木质房屋的建造速度是否比其他建筑更快?

IF 0.6 4区农林科学 Q4 FORESTRY

Revista Arvore Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-908820220000023

V. Araujo, J. Vasconcelos, Juliana Cortez-Barbosa, E. Morales, M. Gava, J. Garcia

{"title":"木质房屋的建造速度是否比其他建筑更快?","authors":"V. Araujo, J. Vasconcelos, Juliana Cortez-Barbosa, E. Morales, M. Gava, J. Garcia","doi":"10.1590/1806-908820220000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To identify the time spent with the different construction techniques of timber houses, this study evaluates the execution time of different models available in Brazil. Using face-to-face interviews, semi-structured questionnaires were randomly applied to collect average time according to distinct production methods. The most efficient techniques were: ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘post-and-beam’, and ‘log-home’ using artisanal production; ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘stick framing with masonry’, and ‘post-and-beam’ in semi-industrial process; and, ‘modular for building sites’, ‘modular in cross-laminated timber’ and ‘modular woodframe’ in industrial production. Different industrial developers were not as agile as artisanal competitors due to production obstacles in customized projects. Timber construction offers lower execution time than masonry, representing an agile form to build a versatile sustainable dwelling.","PeriodicalId":21214,"journal":{"name":"Revista Arvore","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAN TIMBER HOUSES BE PRODUCTIVELY FASTER TO BUILD THAN OTHER BUILDINGS?\",\"authors\":\"V. Araujo, J. Vasconcelos, Juliana Cortez-Barbosa, E. Morales, M. Gava, J. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-908820220000023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT To identify the time spent with the different construction techniques of timber houses, this study evaluates the execution time of different models available in Brazil. Using face-to-face interviews, semi-structured questionnaires were randomly applied to collect average time according to distinct production methods. The most efficient techniques were: ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘post-and-beam’, and ‘log-home’ using artisanal production; ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘stick framing with masonry’, and ‘post-and-beam’ in semi-industrial process; and, ‘modular for building sites’, ‘modular in cross-laminated timber’ and ‘modular woodframe’ in industrial production. Different industrial developers were not as agile as artisanal competitors due to production obstacles in customized projects. Timber construction offers lower execution time than masonry, representing an agile form to build a versatile sustainable dwelling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Arvore\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Arvore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820220000023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Arvore","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820220000023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:为了确定不同木材房屋建造技术所花费的时间，本研究评估了巴西不同模型的执行时间。采用面对面访谈，随机采用半结构化问卷，根据不同的生产方法收集平均时间。最有效的技术是:“隔板和护墙板”，“后梁”和“原木”使用手工生产;“护墙板和护墙板”、“砖石框架”和半工业过程中的“柱梁”;此外，“建筑工地的模块化”、“交叉层压木材的模块化”和“工业生产的模块化木框架”。由于定制项目的生产障碍，不同的工业开发商不如手工竞争者敏捷。木结构比砖石结构的施工时间更短，代表了一种灵活的形式，可以建造多功能的可持续住宅。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

CAN TIMBER HOUSES BE PRODUCTIVELY FASTER TO BUILD THAN OTHER BUILDINGS?

ABSTRACT To identify the time spent with the different construction techniques of timber houses, this study evaluates the execution time of different models available in Brazil. Using face-to-face interviews, semi-structured questionnaires were randomly applied to collect average time according to distinct production methods. The most efficient techniques were: ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘post-and-beam’, and ‘log-home’ using artisanal production; ‘clapboard and wainscot’, ‘stick framing with masonry’, and ‘post-and-beam’ in semi-industrial process; and, ‘modular for building sites’, ‘modular in cross-laminated timber’ and ‘modular woodframe’ in industrial production. Different industrial developers were not as agile as artisanal competitors due to production obstacles in customized projects. Timber construction offers lower execution time than masonry, representing an agile form to build a versatile sustainable dwelling.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista Arvore FORESTRY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： A Revista Árvore é um veículo de comunicação científica da Sociedade de Investigações Florestais – SIF. O jornal é de acesso gratuito, revisado por pares, que publica bimestralmente trabalhos científicos originais no campo da Ciência Florestal. As áreas temáticas para publicação são: Ambiência e Conservação da Natureza, Manejo Florestal, Silvicultura e Tecnologia da Madeira e Utilização de Produtos Florestais. A política editorial visa manter alta conduta ética em relação à publicação e aos seus funcionários, rigor na qualidade dos artigos científicos, seleção de revisores qualificados, respeito profissional aos autores e processo de tomada de decisão imparcial. A Revista Árvore publica artigos apenas em inglês. Artigos de revisão podem ser publicados se houver uma discussão relevante resumindo o estado da arte sobre o assunto. A revisão estrita da literatura não é aceita.