保护种子库收集管理的决策支持:发芽和生存能力的比较

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Gemma L. Hoyle, Joshua A. Hodges, B. Clinton, Rhys Tooth, T. Neeman, L. Guja
{"title":"保护种子库收集管理的决策支持:发芽和生存能力的比较","authors":"Gemma L. Hoyle, Joshua A. Hodges, B. Clinton, Rhys Tooth, T. Neeman, L. Guja","doi":"10.15258/sst.2023.51.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Without knowledge of seed germination requirements, conservation seed bank collections cannot be utilised, nor their viability monitored over time. When germination is low, deciding whether to invest further seed, time and resources into investigating why can be difficult. We investigated the germinability of 37 grassy ecosystem seed bank collections, including germination response to fire-related cues. Where germination was < 75% we investigated seed viability using the tetrazolium chloride (TZ) staining test. Germination and TZ test results were then compared to determine next steps in collection management. Using 95% confidence intervals of the difference between germination and viability, the 37 collections were assigned to one of seven different data-informed management decisions. This approach provides a detailed decision support framework for conservation collection management, to strengthen current guidelines and ensure that time and resources are effectively allocated. Other seed banks could customise this approach depending on the number of seeds used in testing and what percentage of germination is considered sufficient.","PeriodicalId":21662,"journal":{"name":"Seed Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision support for managing conservation seed bank collections: comparing germination and viability\",\"authors\":\"Gemma L. Hoyle, Joshua A. Hodges, B. Clinton, Rhys Tooth, T. Neeman, L. Guja\",\"doi\":\"10.15258/sst.2023.51.2.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Without knowledge of seed germination requirements, conservation seed bank collections cannot be utilised, nor their viability monitored over time. When germination is low, deciding whether to invest further seed, time and resources into investigating why can be difficult. We investigated the germinability of 37 grassy ecosystem seed bank collections, including germination response to fire-related cues. Where germination was < 75% we investigated seed viability using the tetrazolium chloride (TZ) staining test. Germination and TZ test results were then compared to determine next steps in collection management. Using 95% confidence intervals of the difference between germination and viability, the 37 collections were assigned to one of seven different data-informed management decisions. This approach provides a detailed decision support framework for conservation collection management, to strengthen current guidelines and ensure that time and resources are effectively allocated. Other seed banks could customise this approach depending on the number of seeds used in testing and what percentage of germination is considered sufficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2023.51.2.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2023.51.2.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果不了解种子萌发要求,保护种子库的收集就无法利用,也无法长期监测它们的生存能力。当萌芽率很低时,决定是否投入更多的种子、时间和资源来调查原因可能会很困难。研究了37种草地生态系统种子库的萌发能力,包括萌发对火灾相关线索的响应。当萌发率< 75%时,我们用四氮唑氯(TZ)染色试验研究种子活力。然后比较发芽和TZ试验的结果,以确定收集管理的下一步。利用萌发和活力之间差异的95%置信区间,将37个收集物分配到7个不同的数据知情管理决策之一。这种方法为保护收集管理提供了一个详细的决策支持框架,以加强现行的指导方针,并确保时间和资源得到有效分配。其他种子库可以根据测试中使用的种子数量和被认为足够的发芽率来定制这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision support for managing conservation seed bank collections: comparing germination and viability
Without knowledge of seed germination requirements, conservation seed bank collections cannot be utilised, nor their viability monitored over time. When germination is low, deciding whether to invest further seed, time and resources into investigating why can be difficult. We investigated the germinability of 37 grassy ecosystem seed bank collections, including germination response to fire-related cues. Where germination was < 75% we investigated seed viability using the tetrazolium chloride (TZ) staining test. Germination and TZ test results were then compared to determine next steps in collection management. Using 95% confidence intervals of the difference between germination and viability, the 37 collections were assigned to one of seven different data-informed management decisions. This approach provides a detailed decision support framework for conservation collection management, to strengthen current guidelines and ensure that time and resources are effectively allocated. Other seed banks could customise this approach depending on the number of seeds used in testing and what percentage of germination is considered sufficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seed Science and Technology
Seed Science and Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Seed Science and Technology (SST) is an international journal featuring original papers and articles on seed quality and physiology related to seed production, harvest, processing, sampling, storage, genetic conservation, habitat regeneration, distribution and testing. A journal that meets the needs of researchers, advisers and all those involved in the improvement and technical control of seed quality. Published every April, August and December.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信