紧迫的遗产

IF 0.6 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Caetlin Benson-Allott
{"title":"紧迫的遗产","authors":"Caetlin Benson-Allott","doi":"10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol hearings were the must-see TV of the summer of 2022. FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott argues that the hearings’ compositional form and ideological structures dramatized the differences between televisual liveness and live streaming (i.e., videos created, distributed, and received concurrently online). The Select Committee hearings affirmed television’s cultural significance: they upheld television as the medium for national conversations and, through their invocation of historic television formulas and ideologies of liveness, marked television as a legacy medium whose very datedness bestows a certain gravitas on its contents. In so doing, the hearings reasserted both the Select Committee’s power and the power of television.","PeriodicalId":45540,"journal":{"name":"FILM QUARTERLY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Urgent Legacy\",\"authors\":\"Caetlin Benson-Allott\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The US House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol hearings were the must-see TV of the summer of 2022. FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott argues that the hearings’ compositional form and ideological structures dramatized the differences between televisual liveness and live streaming (i.e., videos created, distributed, and received concurrently online). The Select Committee hearings affirmed television’s cultural significance: they upheld television as the medium for national conversations and, through their invocation of historic television formulas and ideologies of liveness, marked television as a legacy medium whose very datedness bestows a certain gravitas on its contents. In so doing, the hearings reasserted both the Select Committee’s power and the power of television.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.93\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.93","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国众议院特别委员会调查1月6日袭击美国国会大厦的听证会是2022年夏天必看的电视节目。FQ专栏作家Caetlin Benson-Allott认为,听证会的组成形式和意识形态结构戏剧化了电视直播和直播(即在线同时制作、分发和接收的视频)之间的差异。特别委员会的听证会肯定了电视的文化意义:他们坚持电视是全国对话的媒介,并通过援引历史上的电视公式和生动的意识形态,将电视标记为一种传统媒介,其过时的特性赋予其内容某种庄严。这样做,听证会重申了特别委员会的权力和电视的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Urgent Legacy
The US House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol hearings were the must-see TV of the summer of 2022. FQ columnist Caetlin Benson-Allott argues that the hearings’ compositional form and ideological structures dramatized the differences between televisual liveness and live streaming (i.e., videos created, distributed, and received concurrently online). The Select Committee hearings affirmed television’s cultural significance: they upheld television as the medium for national conversations and, through their invocation of historic television formulas and ideologies of liveness, marked television as a legacy medium whose very datedness bestows a certain gravitas on its contents. In so doing, the hearings reasserted both the Select Committee’s power and the power of television.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FILM QUARTERLY
FILM QUARTERLY FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Film Quarterly has been publishing substantial, peer-reviewed writing on motion pictures since 1958, earning a reputation as the most authoritative academic film journal in the United States. Its wide array of topics, perspectives, and approaches appeals to film scholars and film buffs alike. If you love all types of movies and are eager to encounter new ways of thinking about them, then Film Quarterly is the journal for you! Scholarly analyses of international cinemas, current blockbusters and Hollywood classics, documentaries, animation, and independent, avant-garde, and experimental film and video fill the pages of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信