反垄断诉讼中基准损害赔偿的衡量

Q3 Mathematics
J. Mccrary, D. Rubinfeld
{"title":"反垄断诉讼中基准损害赔偿的衡量","authors":"J. Mccrary, D. Rubinfeld","doi":"10.1515/JEM-2013-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We compare the two dominant approaches to estimation of benchmark damages in antitrust litigation, the forecasting approach and the dummy variable approach. We give conditions under which the two approaches are equivalent and present the results of a small simulation study.","PeriodicalId":36727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Econometric Methods","volume":"35 1","pages":"63 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/JEM-2013-0006","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Benchmark Damages in Antitrust Litigation\",\"authors\":\"J. Mccrary, D. Rubinfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/JEM-2013-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We compare the two dominant approaches to estimation of benchmark damages in antitrust litigation, the forecasting approach and the dummy variable approach. We give conditions under which the two approaches are equivalent and present the results of a small simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Econometric Methods\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/JEM-2013-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Econometric Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEM-2013-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Econometric Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JEM-2013-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

摘要本文比较了两种主要的反垄断诉讼基准损害赔偿估计方法:预测法和虚拟变量法。我们给出了两种方法等价的条件,并给出了一个小型模拟研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Benchmark Damages in Antitrust Litigation
Abstract We compare the two dominant approaches to estimation of benchmark damages in antitrust litigation, the forecasting approach and the dummy variable approach. We give conditions under which the two approaches are equivalent and present the results of a small simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Econometric Methods
Journal of Econometric Methods Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信