人类学话语中的人类中心主义与民族学

Dejan Trickovic
{"title":"人类学话语中的人类中心主义与民族学","authors":"Dejan Trickovic","doi":"10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the central concerns that is common to a broad spectrum of post-Nietzschean philosophies is the critical deconstruction of the metaphysical foundations of the discourse in the West. The opus of Michel Foucault, more specifically his critique of the epistemological centrality of the modern concept of Man and the discourse/culture of anthropocentrism which is predicated on it, represents a continuation of that tradition. This text explores the implications of Foucault's critique for the science of anthropology, addressing specifically the latter's relation to the anthropocentric episteme. In the concluding section it brings on an interesting opposition between anthropology as the project of human self-knowledge and ethnology as cultural transcendence and encounter with the culturally other.</p>","PeriodicalId":84419,"journal":{"name":"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society","volume":"9 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropocentrism vs. Ethnology in the Discourse of Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Dejan Trickovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One of the central concerns that is common to a broad spectrum of post-Nietzschean philosophies is the critical deconstruction of the metaphysical foundations of the discourse in the West. The opus of Michel Foucault, more specifically his critique of the epistemological centrality of the modern concept of Man and the discourse/culture of anthropocentrism which is predicated on it, represents a continuation of that tradition. This text explores the implications of Foucault's critique for the science of anthropology, addressing specifically the latter's relation to the anthropocentric episteme. In the concluding section it brings on an interesting opposition between anthropology as the project of human self-knowledge and ethnology as cultural transcendence and encounter with the culturally other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"69-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/cia.1991.9.1.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后尼采哲学的一个共同的中心问题是对西方话语的形而上学基础的批判性解构。米歇尔·福柯的作品,更具体地说,是他对现代人类概念的认识论中心性的批判,以及基于此的人类中心主义的话语/文化,代表了这一传统的延续。本文探讨了福柯对人类学科学的批判的含义,特别是后者与人类中心主义的关系。在结论部分,它带来了一个有趣的对立,人类学作为人类自我认识的项目,民族学作为文化超越和与文化他者的相遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anthropocentrism vs. Ethnology in the Discourse of Anthropology

One of the central concerns that is common to a broad spectrum of post-Nietzschean philosophies is the critical deconstruction of the metaphysical foundations of the discourse in the West. The opus of Michel Foucault, more specifically his critique of the epistemological centrality of the modern concept of Man and the discourse/culture of anthropocentrism which is predicated on it, represents a continuation of that tradition. This text explores the implications of Foucault's critique for the science of anthropology, addressing specifically the latter's relation to the anthropocentric episteme. In the concluding section it brings on an interesting opposition between anthropology as the project of human self-knowledge and ethnology as cultural transcendence and encounter with the culturally other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信