特别司法在马科Csanád主教的主

Zsolt Urbancsok
{"title":"特别司法在马科Csanád主教的主","authors":"Zsolt Urbancsok","doi":"10.14232/belv.2022.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 18th century the agricultural town of Makó (oppidum) became incorporated into the Bishopric of Csanád. As a consequence, the bishop-landowners obtained the rights and obligations of jurisdiction (impensio) over their serfs. In the town, developing into an economic and administrative centre, jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts (sedes dominalis) had existed from the very beginning. Their aims were fast and effective jurisdiction. Between 1717 and 1805 plenipotentiary representatives exercised this right. However, from the first decade of the 19th century it was the manor prosecutors (fiscalis) who discharged primary jurisdiction. László Kőszeghi, a bishop-landowner, at the same time (1805) as organising the estate of Makó, had also reformed he jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts. A separate representative led the administrative and economic offices. In the spirit of the legislation of 1836, the Bishopric had also established oral lawsuits in the court of justice in Makó; this had later replaced the administrative office. In 1838 – also according to legislation – criminal courts dealing with compulsory labour were organised, primarily to prevent the refusal of work by serfs resentful for the incresing burden falling on them.","PeriodicalId":30998,"journal":{"name":"Belvedere Meridionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Úriszéken kívüli bíráskodás a Csanádi Püspökség Makói Uradalmában\",\"authors\":\"Zsolt Urbancsok\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/belv.2022.3.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the beginning of the 18th century the agricultural town of Makó (oppidum) became incorporated into the Bishopric of Csanád. As a consequence, the bishop-landowners obtained the rights and obligations of jurisdiction (impensio) over their serfs. In the town, developing into an economic and administrative centre, jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts (sedes dominalis) had existed from the very beginning. Their aims were fast and effective jurisdiction. Between 1717 and 1805 plenipotentiary representatives exercised this right. However, from the first decade of the 19th century it was the manor prosecutors (fiscalis) who discharged primary jurisdiction. László Kőszeghi, a bishop-landowner, at the same time (1805) as organising the estate of Makó, had also reformed he jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts. A separate representative led the administrative and economic offices. In the spirit of the legislation of 1836, the Bishopric had also established oral lawsuits in the court of justice in Makó; this had later replaced the administrative office. In 1838 – also according to legislation – criminal courts dealing with compulsory labour were organised, primarily to prevent the refusal of work by serfs resentful for the incresing burden falling on them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belvedere Meridionale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belvedere Meridionale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2022.3.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belvedere Meridionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2022.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

18世纪初,农业城镇Makó (oppidum)并入Csanád主教辖区。因此,主教地主获得了对其农奴管辖的权利和义务(imppensio)。在该镇,发展成为一个经济和行政中心,庄园法院(sedes dominalis)之外的管辖权从一开始就存在。他们的目标是快速和有效的司法。1717年至1805年间,全权代表行使了这项权利。然而,从19世纪的第一个十年开始,是庄园检察官(财政检察官)行使初级管辖权。主教地主László Kőszeghi在组织Makó庄园的同时(1805年),也改革了庄园法院以外的管辖权。行政和经济办公室由另一名代表领导。本着1836年立法的精神,主教教区还在Makó法院建立了口头诉讼;这个办公室后来取代了行政办公室。1838年,根据法律规定,成立了处理强制劳动的刑事法庭,主要是为了防止农奴因负担越来越重而拒绝工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Úriszéken kívüli bíráskodás a Csanádi Püspökség Makói Uradalmában
At the beginning of the 18th century the agricultural town of Makó (oppidum) became incorporated into the Bishopric of Csanád. As a consequence, the bishop-landowners obtained the rights and obligations of jurisdiction (impensio) over their serfs. In the town, developing into an economic and administrative centre, jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts (sedes dominalis) had existed from the very beginning. Their aims were fast and effective jurisdiction. Between 1717 and 1805 plenipotentiary representatives exercised this right. However, from the first decade of the 19th century it was the manor prosecutors (fiscalis) who discharged primary jurisdiction. László Kőszeghi, a bishop-landowner, at the same time (1805) as organising the estate of Makó, had also reformed he jurisdiction outside the Manor Courts. A separate representative led the administrative and economic offices. In the spirit of the legislation of 1836, the Bishopric had also established oral lawsuits in the court of justice in Makó; this had later replaced the administrative office. In 1838 – also according to legislation – criminal courts dealing with compulsory labour were organised, primarily to prevent the refusal of work by serfs resentful for the incresing burden falling on them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信