模糊认知图及其在社会科学研究中的应用:主要问题研究

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Infante-Moro, J. Infante-Moro, Julia Gallardo-Pérez
{"title":"模糊认知图及其在社会科学研究中的应用:主要问题研究","authors":"A. Infante-Moro, J. Infante-Moro, Julia Gallardo-Pérez","doi":"10.14201/eks.26380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodology of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) is one of the most relevant in the study of knowledge and, probably, one of the most used in recent times by researchers in their studies and projects. This paper analyzes, through a bibliographic review by the main scientific databases, the use of this tool in scientific research and its application in the social sciences, as well as providing historical references in this regard. It shows the main characteristics of the methodology, its possibilities and limitations, its differences with its predecessor (Cognitive Maps), the operational phases for its application and the different ways of capturing information. In addition to demonstrating the suitability of its application in the field of social sciences and studying its major problems, the identification of the concepts involved within the system to be studied, the selection of experts and the coefficients or weights of the knowledge of each of these ones, offering suggestions and contributions for a correct identification of the concepts involved, a correct selection of these experts and a correct quantification of their coefficients of \"expert knowledge\".","PeriodicalId":45123,"journal":{"name":"Education in the Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and their Application in Social Science Research: A Study of their Main Problems\",\"authors\":\"A. Infante-Moro, J. Infante-Moro, Julia Gallardo-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/eks.26380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The methodology of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) is one of the most relevant in the study of knowledge and, probably, one of the most used in recent times by researchers in their studies and projects. This paper analyzes, through a bibliographic review by the main scientific databases, the use of this tool in scientific research and its application in the social sciences, as well as providing historical references in this regard. It shows the main characteristics of the methodology, its possibilities and limitations, its differences with its predecessor (Cognitive Maps), the operational phases for its application and the different ways of capturing information. In addition to demonstrating the suitability of its application in the field of social sciences and studying its major problems, the identification of the concepts involved within the system to be studied, the selection of experts and the coefficients or weights of the knowledge of each of these ones, offering suggestions and contributions for a correct identification of the concepts involved, a correct selection of these experts and a correct quantification of their coefficients of \\\"expert knowledge\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":45123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.26380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.26380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

模糊认知图(fcm)是知识研究中最相关的方法之一,也是近年来研究人员在研究和项目中使用最多的方法之一。本文通过对主要科学数据库的文献综述,分析了该工具在科学研究中的使用及其在社会科学中的应用,并提供了这方面的历史参考。它展示了方法论的主要特征,它的可能性和局限性,它与它的前身(认知地图)的区别,它的应用的操作阶段和获取信息的不同方式。除了证明其在社会科学领域应用的适宜性和研究其主要问题外,确定所研究的系统内涉及的概念,选择专家和每个专家的知识的系数或权重,为正确确定所涉及的概念提供建议和贡献,正确选择这些专家,并正确量化他们的“专家知识”系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and their Application in Social Science Research: A Study of their Main Problems
The methodology of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) is one of the most relevant in the study of knowledge and, probably, one of the most used in recent times by researchers in their studies and projects. This paper analyzes, through a bibliographic review by the main scientific databases, the use of this tool in scientific research and its application in the social sciences, as well as providing historical references in this regard. It shows the main characteristics of the methodology, its possibilities and limitations, its differences with its predecessor (Cognitive Maps), the operational phases for its application and the different ways of capturing information. In addition to demonstrating the suitability of its application in the field of social sciences and studying its major problems, the identification of the concepts involved within the system to be studied, the selection of experts and the coefficients or weights of the knowledge of each of these ones, offering suggestions and contributions for a correct identification of the concepts involved, a correct selection of these experts and a correct quantification of their coefficients of "expert knowledge".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education in the Knowledge Society
Education in the Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
10.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信