行为经济学对抗击COVID-19的影响

Yefferson Llonto Caicedo, Lindon Vela Meléndez
{"title":"行为经济学对抗击COVID-19的影响","authors":"Yefferson Llonto Caicedo, Lindon Vela Meléndez","doi":"10.14198/GEOGRA2021.12.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research had the objective of characterizing the use of behavioral economics to combat the COVID19, approaching a study through the systematic review of literature; related to the integrative literature design. The results indicate that policy makers use non-pharmaceutical interventions, based on behavioral economics and psychology because they are less expensive to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases. There are several publications addressing cognitive, psychological and social factors that influence irrational behavior of people at the time of decision making, which cannot be predicted with mathematical and statistical models, as opposed to the neoclassical economic theory that is based on the maximization of utility. It has been determined that there are diverse behavioral tools to face behavioral biases for the adequate decision making, being \"nudging\"as the main tool to counteract the cognitive costs of absorbing information in the propagation of the COVID19 virus; hence, the thematic approach has intersubjective elements typical of are search in the qualitative route, which is why it is considered to be submitted to comparisons and scrutinies through diverse methods and approaches.","PeriodicalId":30380,"journal":{"name":"GeoGraphos Revista Digital para Estudiantes de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencia de la economía del comportamiento para combatir el COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Yefferson Llonto Caicedo, Lindon Vela Meléndez\",\"doi\":\"10.14198/GEOGRA2021.12.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research had the objective of characterizing the use of behavioral economics to combat the COVID19, approaching a study through the systematic review of literature; related to the integrative literature design. The results indicate that policy makers use non-pharmaceutical interventions, based on behavioral economics and psychology because they are less expensive to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases. There are several publications addressing cognitive, psychological and social factors that influence irrational behavior of people at the time of decision making, which cannot be predicted with mathematical and statistical models, as opposed to the neoclassical economic theory that is based on the maximization of utility. It has been determined that there are diverse behavioral tools to face behavioral biases for the adequate decision making, being \\\"nudging\\\"as the main tool to counteract the cognitive costs of absorbing information in the propagation of the COVID19 virus; hence, the thematic approach has intersubjective elements typical of are search in the qualitative route, which is why it is considered to be submitted to comparisons and scrutinies through diverse methods and approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeoGraphos Revista Digital para Estudiantes de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeoGraphos Revista Digital para Estudiantes de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14198/GEOGRA2021.12.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoGraphos Revista Digital para Estudiantes de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/GEOGRA2021.12.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述行为经济学在抗击covid - 19中的应用,通过对文献的系统回顾来进行研究;相关的综合文献设计。研究结果表明,决策者基于行为经济学和心理学使用非药物干预措施,因为它们减少传染病传播的成本较低。与以效用最大化为基础的新古典经济理论相反,有一些出版物论述了影响人们在决策时非理性行为的认知、心理和社会因素,这些因素无法用数学和统计模型预测。已经确定,为了做出适当的决策,有多种行为工具来面对行为偏见,“轻推”是抵消新冠病毒传播过程中吸收信息的认知成本的主要工具;因此,主题方法具有定性路径中典型的主体间性元素,这就是为什么它被认为是通过不同的方法和方法进行比较和审查的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influencia de la economía del comportamiento para combatir el COVID-19
The present research had the objective of characterizing the use of behavioral economics to combat the COVID19, approaching a study through the systematic review of literature; related to the integrative literature design. The results indicate that policy makers use non-pharmaceutical interventions, based on behavioral economics and psychology because they are less expensive to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases. There are several publications addressing cognitive, psychological and social factors that influence irrational behavior of people at the time of decision making, which cannot be predicted with mathematical and statistical models, as opposed to the neoclassical economic theory that is based on the maximization of utility. It has been determined that there are diverse behavioral tools to face behavioral biases for the adequate decision making, being "nudging"as the main tool to counteract the cognitive costs of absorbing information in the propagation of the COVID19 virus; hence, the thematic approach has intersubjective elements typical of are search in the qualitative route, which is why it is considered to be submitted to comparisons and scrutinies through diverse methods and approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信