苏格拉底与特拉西马库斯论完美与不完美的不公正

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Roslyn Weiss
{"title":"苏格拉底与特拉西马库斯论完美与不完美的不公正","authors":"Roslyn Weiss","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_22_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that the true definition of justice in Plato’s Republic appears not in Book IV but in Book I, where it is clear that justice is other-oriented or external rather than internal as per Book IV. Indeed, on Book IV’s definition, there is virtually no difference between justice and moderation. Considered here is a single argument between Socrates and Thrasymachus (351b-352d), in which Socrates contends that imperfect injustice is “stronger” than perfect. Rather than producing a just group, the justice between members of a group strengthens the injustice of a group whose external project is already unjust.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socrates and Thrasymachus on Perfect and Imperfect Injustice\",\"authors\":\"Roslyn Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2183-4105_22_6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is argued that the true definition of justice in Plato’s Republic appears not in Book IV but in Book I, where it is clear that justice is other-oriented or external rather than internal as per Book IV. Indeed, on Book IV’s definition, there is virtually no difference between justice and moderation. Considered here is a single argument between Socrates and Thrasymachus (351b-352d), in which Socrates contends that imperfect injustice is “stronger” than perfect. Rather than producing a just group, the justice between members of a group strengthens the injustice of a group whose external project is already unjust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plato Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plato Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人认为,柏拉图《理想国》中正义的真正定义不是出现在第四卷,而是出现在第一卷,在第一卷中,很明显,正义是面向他人的或外部的,而不是像第四卷那样是内部的。事实上,在第四卷的定义中,正义和适度之间实际上没有区别。这里考虑的是苏格拉底和Thrasymachus (351b-352d)之间的一个论点,苏格拉底认为不完美的不公正比完美的更“强大”。而不是产生一个公正的群体,一个群体成员之间的正义加强了一个群体的不公正,这个群体的外部项目已经是不公正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socrates and Thrasymachus on Perfect and Imperfect Injustice
It is argued that the true definition of justice in Plato’s Republic appears not in Book IV but in Book I, where it is clear that justice is other-oriented or external rather than internal as per Book IV. Indeed, on Book IV’s definition, there is virtually no difference between justice and moderation. Considered here is a single argument between Socrates and Thrasymachus (351b-352d), in which Socrates contends that imperfect injustice is “stronger” than perfect. Rather than producing a just group, the justice between members of a group strengthens the injustice of a group whose external project is already unjust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信