发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

约翰·克罗斯拜因对伪亚里士多德植物论的评注:批判版

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703
M. Panarelli
{"title":"约翰·克罗斯拜因对伪亚里士多德植物论的评注:批判版","authors":"M. Panarelli","doi":"10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Krosbein is thought to have been active in the second half of fourteenth century and as such his commentary on De plantis is an isolated case, which lengthens the Pseudo-Aristotelian text's re...","PeriodicalId":35962,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Krosbein’s Commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian De plantis: A Critical Edition\",\"authors\":\"M. Panarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Krosbein is thought to have been active in the second half of fourteenth century and as such his commentary on De plantis is an isolated case, which lengthens the Pseudo-Aristotelian text's re...\",\"PeriodicalId\":35962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

约翰·克罗斯拜因被认为活跃于14世纪下半叶，因此他对《植物论》的评论是一个孤立的案例，它延长了伪亚里士多德文本的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
John Krosbein’s Commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian De plantis: A Critical Edition
John Krosbein is thought to have been active in the second half of fourteenth century and as such his commentary on De plantis is an isolated case, which lengthens the Pseudo-Aristotelian text's re...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale
Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信