DSM-IV-TR和错乱症

C. Moser, Peggy J. Kleinplatz
{"title":"DSM-IV-TR和错乱症","authors":"C. Moser, Peggy J. Kleinplatz","doi":"10.1300/J056v17n03_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The DSM-IV-TR (2000) sets its own standards for inclusion of diagnoses and for changes in its text. The Paraphilia section is analyzed from the perspective of how well the DSM meets those standards. The concept of Paraphilias as psychopathology was analyzed and assessed critically to determine if it meets the definition of a mental disorder presented in the DSM; it does not. The Paraphilia diagnostic category was critiqued for logic, consistency, clarity, and whether it constitutes a distinct mental disorder. The DSM presents “facts” to substantiate various points made in the text. The veracity of these “facts” was scrutinized. Little evidence was found in their support. Problems with the tradition of equating particular sexual interests with psychopathology were highlighted. It was concluded that the Paraphilia section is so severely flawed that its removal from the DSM is advocated.","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"17 1","pages":"109 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v17n03_05","citationCount":"156","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias\",\"authors\":\"C. Moser, Peggy J. Kleinplatz\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J056v17n03_05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The DSM-IV-TR (2000) sets its own standards for inclusion of diagnoses and for changes in its text. The Paraphilia section is analyzed from the perspective of how well the DSM meets those standards. The concept of Paraphilias as psychopathology was analyzed and assessed critically to determine if it meets the definition of a mental disorder presented in the DSM; it does not. The Paraphilia diagnostic category was critiqued for logic, consistency, clarity, and whether it constitutes a distinct mental disorder. The DSM presents “facts” to substantiate various points made in the text. The veracity of these “facts” was scrutinized. Little evidence was found in their support. Problems with the tradition of equating particular sexual interests with psychopathology were highlighted. It was concluded that the Paraphilia section is so severely flawed that its removal from the DSM is advocated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v17n03_05\",\"citationCount\":\"156\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v17n03_05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v17n03_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 156

摘要

DSM-IV-TR(2000)为诊断的包含和文本的更改设置了自己的标准。从DSM如何满足这些标准的角度分析了性反常部分。对性偏离作为精神病理学的概念进行了分析和批判性评估,以确定它是否符合DSM中对精神障碍的定义;但事实并非如此。反性恋诊断类别因其逻辑性、一致性、清晰度以及是否构成一种明显的精神障碍而受到批评。DSM提出了“事实”来证实文本中提出的各种观点。这些“事实”的真实性经过了仔细审查。几乎找不到支持他们的证据。强调了将特殊的性兴趣等同于精神病理学的传统问题。得出的结论是,性反常部分存在严重缺陷,因此有人主张将其从DSM中删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DSM-IV-TR and the Paraphilias
Abstract The DSM-IV-TR (2000) sets its own standards for inclusion of diagnoses and for changes in its text. The Paraphilia section is analyzed from the perspective of how well the DSM meets those standards. The concept of Paraphilias as psychopathology was analyzed and assessed critically to determine if it meets the definition of a mental disorder presented in the DSM; it does not. The Paraphilia diagnostic category was critiqued for logic, consistency, clarity, and whether it constitutes a distinct mental disorder. The DSM presents “facts” to substantiate various points made in the text. The veracity of these “facts” was scrutinized. Little evidence was found in their support. Problems with the tradition of equating particular sexual interests with psychopathology were highlighted. It was concluded that the Paraphilia section is so severely flawed that its removal from the DSM is advocated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信