性别失调

Kelley Winters
{"title":"性别失调","authors":"Kelley Winters","doi":"10.1300/J056v17n03_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since its appearance in 1980, the diagnostic category “gender identity disorder” (GID) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has sparked concern among gender variant people and their advocates that it contributes to hurtful stigma and social barriers faced by gender variant individuals, while at the same time it contradicts the medical legitimacy of sex reassignment for the treatment of gender dysphoria. This paper examines the GID diagnosis of adults and adolescents and the social and medical consequences posed by its implication of “disordered” gender identity. Parallels are drawn to the removal of homosexuality and ego dystonic homosexuality from the DSM in the 1970s and '80s. At issue is the label of mental illness for behaviors that are otherwise ordinary or even exemplary based only on natal anatomical sex. Finally, a path forward is proposed to replace GID with a new diagnosis unambiguously defined by chronic distress rather than social nonconformity.","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"17 1","pages":"71 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v17n03_04","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Dissonance\",\"authors\":\"Kelley Winters\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J056v17n03_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since its appearance in 1980, the diagnostic category “gender identity disorder” (GID) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has sparked concern among gender variant people and their advocates that it contributes to hurtful stigma and social barriers faced by gender variant individuals, while at the same time it contradicts the medical legitimacy of sex reassignment for the treatment of gender dysphoria. This paper examines the GID diagnosis of adults and adolescents and the social and medical consequences posed by its implication of “disordered” gender identity. Parallels are drawn to the removal of homosexuality and ego dystonic homosexuality from the DSM in the 1970s and '80s. At issue is the label of mental illness for behaviors that are otherwise ordinary or even exemplary based only on natal anatomical sex. Finally, a path forward is proposed to replace GID with a new diagnosis unambiguously defined by chronic distress rather than social nonconformity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v17n03_04\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v17n03_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v17n03_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

自1980年《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中出现“性别认同障碍”(gender identity disorder, GID)这一诊断类别以来,它引发了性别变异者及其支持者的关注,认为它助长了性别变异个体所面临的有害污名和社会障碍,同时也与性别重置治疗性别焦虑症的医学合法性相矛盾。本文探讨了成人和青少年的性别认知障碍诊断,以及性别认同“紊乱”所带来的社会和医疗后果。在20世纪70年代和80年代,人们将同性恋和自我失调性同性恋从DSM中删除。争论的焦点是,对于那些原本很普通甚至是典型的行为,只根据出生时的生理性别来给它们贴上精神疾病的标签。最后,提出了一条前进的道路,用一种新的诊断来取代GID,明确地定义为慢性痛苦,而不是社会不符合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Dissonance
Abstract Since its appearance in 1980, the diagnostic category “gender identity disorder” (GID) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has sparked concern among gender variant people and their advocates that it contributes to hurtful stigma and social barriers faced by gender variant individuals, while at the same time it contradicts the medical legitimacy of sex reassignment for the treatment of gender dysphoria. This paper examines the GID diagnosis of adults and adolescents and the social and medical consequences posed by its implication of “disordered” gender identity. Parallels are drawn to the removal of homosexuality and ego dystonic homosexuality from the DSM in the 1970s and '80s. At issue is the label of mental illness for behaviors that are otherwise ordinary or even exemplary based only on natal anatomical sex. Finally, a path forward is proposed to replace GID with a new diagnosis unambiguously defined by chronic distress rather than social nonconformity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信