传统方法与半自动方法肩关节活动度评估的比较

IF 0.9 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sonia C Mantilla, C. Peña, G. G. Moreno
{"title":"传统方法与半自动方法肩关节活动度评估的比较","authors":"Sonia C Mantilla, C. Peña, G. G. Moreno","doi":"10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—This article compares the results obtained from applying two methods of measuring the range of motion in the upper extremity. From a descriptive, cross-sectional study, measurements were made using the most widely used and traditional method in the health area known as goniometry as well as a semi-automatic method developed using new technological tools. The results demonstrated that the technique has a high sensitivity and can analyze static body positions and movement evolutions, expanding its applicability range","PeriodicalId":36452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Information Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation by Traditional and Semi-Automatic Methods\",\"authors\":\"Sonia C Mantilla, C. Peña, G. G. Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"—This article compares the results obtained from applying two methods of measuring the range of motion in the upper extremity. From a descriptive, cross-sectional study, measurements were made using the most widely used and traditional method in the health area known as goniometry as well as a semi-automatic method developed using new technological tools. The results demonstrated that the technique has a high sensitivity and can analyze static body positions and movement evolutions, expanding its applicability range\",\"PeriodicalId\":36452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.4.749-757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了两种测量上肢活动范围的方法所得到的结果。根据一项描述性横断面研究,测量使用了卫生领域最广泛使用的传统方法,即所谓的角度测量法,以及使用新技术工具开发的半自动方法。结果表明,该技术具有较高的灵敏度,可以分析静态身体位置和运动演变,扩大了其适用范围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation by Traditional and Semi-Automatic Methods
—This article compares the results obtained from applying two methods of measuring the range of motion in the upper extremity. From a descriptive, cross-sectional study, measurements were made using the most widely used and traditional method in the health area known as goniometry as well as a semi-automatic method developed using new technological tools. The results demonstrated that the technique has a high sensitivity and can analyze static body positions and movement evolutions, expanding its applicability range
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Information Technology
Journal of Advances in Information Technology Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信