不同图标熵和具体条件下的代际队列图标选择准确性比较

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12720/jait.14.2.250-256
Kleddao Satcharoen, Pikulkaew Tangtisanon
{"title":"不同图标熵和具体条件下的代际队列图标选择准确性比较","authors":"Kleddao Satcharoen, Pikulkaew Tangtisanon","doi":"10.12720/jait.14.2.250-256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—The objective of this research was to compare icon selection accuracy under varying icon entropy and concreteness conditions between different generational cohorts ( Millennial, Generation X, and Baby Boomers ). These generational cohorts have different levels of experience with technology, with younger generations often being framed as “digital natives” and holding stronger technological experience and competence in comparison to older groups. Generational groups also have variations in physiological factors including visual acuity and reaction time. Despite these differences between user groups, many user interaction systems and processes are designed for a single user, rather than considering differences in user processing between different groups. Therefore, this study compares generational cohorts in their icon selection accuracy under varying icon conditions, to help identify what generational differences can be observed in this task. The study selected a sample of 150 participants ( n = 50 for each generational cohort ). The experiment was a 2  2  3 design ( entropy ( high / low )  abstractness ( abstract / concrete )  time ( 9 / 6 / 3 seconds ) , with each participant completing 60 trials ( five questions per entropy / abstractness pair over three timed runs ). Results showed that there were significant differences in mean accuracy per trial under all of the time conditions and icon entropy and concreteness conditions . Mean differences showed that under most conditions, Millennial and Generation X participants did not have a significant mean difference, but Baby Boomers were significantly slower under almost all conditions . The implication of this finding is that Baby Boomers are more sensitive to icon abstractness and entropy conditions than other age groups tested .","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Generational Cohort Comparison of Icon Selection Accuracy under Varying Conditions of Icon Entropy and Concreteness\",\"authors\":\"Kleddao Satcharoen, Pikulkaew Tangtisanon\",\"doi\":\"10.12720/jait.14.2.250-256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"—The objective of this research was to compare icon selection accuracy under varying icon entropy and concreteness conditions between different generational cohorts ( Millennial, Generation X, and Baby Boomers ). These generational cohorts have different levels of experience with technology, with younger generations often being framed as “digital natives” and holding stronger technological experience and competence in comparison to older groups. Generational groups also have variations in physiological factors including visual acuity and reaction time. Despite these differences between user groups, many user interaction systems and processes are designed for a single user, rather than considering differences in user processing between different groups. Therefore, this study compares generational cohorts in their icon selection accuracy under varying icon conditions, to help identify what generational differences can be observed in this task. The study selected a sample of 150 participants ( n = 50 for each generational cohort ). The experiment was a 2  2  3 design ( entropy ( high / low )  abstractness ( abstract / concrete )  time ( 9 / 6 / 3 seconds ) , with each participant completing 60 trials ( five questions per entropy / abstractness pair over three timed runs ). Results showed that there were significant differences in mean accuracy per trial under all of the time conditions and icon entropy and concreteness conditions . Mean differences showed that under most conditions, Millennial and Generation X participants did not have a significant mean difference, but Baby Boomers were significantly slower under almost all conditions . The implication of this finding is that Baby Boomers are more sensitive to icon abstractness and entropy conditions than other age groups tested .\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.2.250-256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.14.2.250-256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-本研究的目的是比较不同世代(千禧一代、X一代和婴儿潮一代)在不同图标熵和具体条件下的图标选择准确性。这几代人对技术有着不同程度的体验,年轻一代通常被认为是“数字原住民”,与年长的群体相比,他们拥有更强的技术经验和能力。不同年龄段的人在视觉敏锐度和反应时间等生理因素上也存在差异。尽管用户组之间存在这些差异,但许多用户交互系统和流程都是为单个用户设计的,而没有考虑到不同组之间用户处理的差异。因此,本研究比较了代际队列在不同图标条件下的图标选择准确性,以帮助确定在该任务中可以观察到的代际差异。该研究选取了150名参与者作为样本(每代50人)。实验采用223设计(熵(高/低)抽象性(抽象/具体)时间(9 / 6 / 3秒),每个参与者完成60个试验(每个熵/抽象性对在3次时间内完成5个问题)。结果表明,在所有的时间条件下,在图标熵和具体性条件下,每次试验的平均准确率存在显著差异。平均差异显示,在大多数情况下,千禧一代和X一代的参与者没有显著的平均差异,但婴儿潮一代在几乎所有情况下都明显慢了下来。这一发现的含义是,婴儿潮一代对图标抽象性和熵条件比其他年龄组更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
A Generational Cohort Comparison of Icon Selection Accuracy under Varying Conditions of Icon Entropy and Concreteness
—The objective of this research was to compare icon selection accuracy under varying icon entropy and concreteness conditions between different generational cohorts ( Millennial, Generation X, and Baby Boomers ). These generational cohorts have different levels of experience with technology, with younger generations often being framed as “digital natives” and holding stronger technological experience and competence in comparison to older groups. Generational groups also have variations in physiological factors including visual acuity and reaction time. Despite these differences between user groups, many user interaction systems and processes are designed for a single user, rather than considering differences in user processing between different groups. Therefore, this study compares generational cohorts in their icon selection accuracy under varying icon conditions, to help identify what generational differences can be observed in this task. The study selected a sample of 150 participants ( n = 50 for each generational cohort ). The experiment was a 2  2  3 design ( entropy ( high / low )  abstractness ( abstract / concrete )  time ( 9 / 6 / 3 seconds ) , with each participant completing 60 trials ( five questions per entropy / abstractness pair over three timed runs ). Results showed that there were significant differences in mean accuracy per trial under all of the time conditions and icon entropy and concreteness conditions . Mean differences showed that under most conditions, Millennial and Generation X participants did not have a significant mean difference, but Baby Boomers were significantly slower under almost all conditions . The implication of this finding is that Baby Boomers are more sensitive to icon abstractness and entropy conditions than other age groups tested .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信