性别和权力敏感性,证券化和社会和平:重新思考对面临分离后暴力的儿童的保护

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Z. Knezevic, Anna Nikupeteri, M. Laitinen, K. Kallinen
{"title":"性别和权力敏感性,证券化和社会和平:重新思考对面临分离后暴力的儿童的保护","authors":"Z. Knezevic, Anna Nikupeteri, M. Laitinen, K. Kallinen","doi":"10.1332/239868021x16212648592069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a rethinking of protection based on synthesised data from Finland and Sweden on children’s and mothers’ experiences of post-separation stalking, and social workers’ case reports on children risking exposure to gender-based violence after separation. Drawing on critical childhood studies and a feminist approach to violence and security, we ask how children’s everyday lives can be incorporated in a rethinking of protection for children in post-separation contexts. Departing from identified limitations in protective solutions for children, we propose three ways of rethinking the issue of protection: (1) protection as gender- and power sensitivity, (2) protection as securitising the here and now, and (3) protection as social peace. Our findings call for some changes in professional practices, social policy and legislation.Key messagesProtective solutions to the problem of gender-based violence in post separation are limited, if existing at all, for exposed children.Orientation towards adults and therapy desecuritise childhoods and children’s social peace.","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender- and power sensitivity, securitisation and social peace: rethinking protection for children exposed to post-separation violence\",\"authors\":\"Z. Knezevic, Anna Nikupeteri, M. Laitinen, K. Kallinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/239868021x16212648592069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article offers a rethinking of protection based on synthesised data from Finland and Sweden on children’s and mothers’ experiences of post-separation stalking, and social workers’ case reports on children risking exposure to gender-based violence after separation. Drawing on critical childhood studies and a feminist approach to violence and security, we ask how children’s everyday lives can be incorporated in a rethinking of protection for children in post-separation contexts. Departing from identified limitations in protective solutions for children, we propose three ways of rethinking the issue of protection: (1) protection as gender- and power sensitivity, (2) protection as securitising the here and now, and (3) protection as social peace. Our findings call for some changes in professional practices, social policy and legislation.Key messagesProtective solutions to the problem of gender-based violence in post separation are limited, if existing at all, for exposed children.Orientation towards adults and therapy desecuritise childhoods and children’s social peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gender-Based Violence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gender-Based Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16212648592069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16212648592069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于芬兰和瑞典关于儿童和母亲在分离后被跟踪的经历的综合数据,以及社会工作者关于分离后儿童可能遭受基于性别的暴力的案例报告,对保护进行了重新思考。根据对儿童的批判性研究和对暴力和安全的女权主义方法,我们询问如何将儿童的日常生活纳入对分离后环境中儿童保护的重新思考。从已确定的儿童保护解决方案的局限性出发,我们提出了三种重新思考保护问题的方法:(1)保护性别和权力敏感性,(2)保护此时此地的安全,(3)保护社会和平。我们的研究结果呼吁在专业实践、社会政策和立法方面做出一些改变。关键信息对于受到伤害的儿童,分离后基于性别的暴力问题的保护性解决办法是有限的,如果有的话。对成人的取向和治疗使儿童和儿童的社会和平失去了安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender- and power sensitivity, securitisation and social peace: rethinking protection for children exposed to post-separation violence
This article offers a rethinking of protection based on synthesised data from Finland and Sweden on children’s and mothers’ experiences of post-separation stalking, and social workers’ case reports on children risking exposure to gender-based violence after separation. Drawing on critical childhood studies and a feminist approach to violence and security, we ask how children’s everyday lives can be incorporated in a rethinking of protection for children in post-separation contexts. Departing from identified limitations in protective solutions for children, we propose three ways of rethinking the issue of protection: (1) protection as gender- and power sensitivity, (2) protection as securitising the here and now, and (3) protection as social peace. Our findings call for some changes in professional practices, social policy and legislation.Key messagesProtective solutions to the problem of gender-based violence in post separation are limited, if existing at all, for exposed children.Orientation towards adults and therapy desecuritise childhoods and children’s social peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信