脊髓损伤研究伙伴关系方法的原则和相关策略:一项定性研究

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
F. Hoekstra, H. Gainforth
{"title":"脊髓损伤研究伙伴关系方法的原则和相关策略:一项定性研究","authors":"F. Hoekstra, H. Gainforth","doi":"10.1332/174426421X16161715996124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Conducting and/or disseminating research in partnership with potential research users is a popular approach to conducting useful and relevant research. Despite calls for guidance to support these research partnerships, evidence-based tools and resources remain limited.Aims and objectives: This study aimed to explore principles and related strategies for conducting and/or disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership with the SCI community, in order to gain insight into ways to support SCI research partnerships.This qualitative study included ten semi-structured interviews with SCI research partnership champions. The interviews focused on participants’ experiences with SCI research projects that are conducted or disseminated in partnership, and related principles and strategies to work in research partnerships.Participants mainly talked about principles related to: (1) the relationship between researchers and research users (for example, respect each other, avoid tokenism); (2) co-production of knowledge (for example, research user engagement early and throughout); and (3) meaningful engagement (for example, allowing flexibility). Examples of related strategies included attending collaborative conferences, research user engagement in refinement of research questions, training in research methods, and hiring people with SCI as part of the research team.Key conclusions: This qualitative study presents research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions). This study can provide guidance for other researchers and research users who want to engage in (SCI) research partnerships. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of evidence-based tools and resources to support future research partnerships.Key messagesWe provide guidance for researchers and research users to engage in research partnerships;The guidance includes research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions);Linking strategies to principles may help researchers and their partners to engage in research partnerships;This study can support the use of research partnership principles within a research system.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principles and related strategies for spinal cord injury research partnership approaches: a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"F. Hoekstra, H. Gainforth\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/174426421X16161715996124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Conducting and/or disseminating research in partnership with potential research users is a popular approach to conducting useful and relevant research. Despite calls for guidance to support these research partnerships, evidence-based tools and resources remain limited.Aims and objectives: This study aimed to explore principles and related strategies for conducting and/or disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership with the SCI community, in order to gain insight into ways to support SCI research partnerships.This qualitative study included ten semi-structured interviews with SCI research partnership champions. The interviews focused on participants’ experiences with SCI research projects that are conducted or disseminated in partnership, and related principles and strategies to work in research partnerships.Participants mainly talked about principles related to: (1) the relationship between researchers and research users (for example, respect each other, avoid tokenism); (2) co-production of knowledge (for example, research user engagement early and throughout); and (3) meaningful engagement (for example, allowing flexibility). Examples of related strategies included attending collaborative conferences, research user engagement in refinement of research questions, training in research methods, and hiring people with SCI as part of the research team.Key conclusions: This qualitative study presents research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions). This study can provide guidance for other researchers and research users who want to engage in (SCI) research partnerships. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of evidence-based tools and resources to support future research partnerships.Key messagesWe provide guidance for researchers and research users to engage in research partnerships;The guidance includes research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions);Linking strategies to principles may help researchers and their partners to engage in research partnerships;This study can support the use of research partnership principles within a research system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16161715996124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16161715996124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:与潜在的研究用户合作进行和/或传播研究是进行有用和相关研究的普遍方法。尽管呼吁为支持这些研究伙伴关系提供指导,但基于证据的工具和资源仍然有限。目的和目标:本研究旨在探讨与SCI社区合作开展和/或传播脊髓损伤(SCI)研究的原则和相关策略,以深入了解支持SCI研究合作的方法。本定性研究包括对SCI研究合作伙伴的十次半结构化访谈。访谈的重点是参与者在合作进行或传播的SCI研究项目中的经验,以及在合作研究中工作的相关原则和策略。与会者主要讨论的原则涉及:(1)研究人员与研究用户之间的关系(例如,相互尊重,避免表示性);(2)知识的共同生产(例如,早期和贯穿始终的研究用户参与);(3)有意义的参与(例如,允许灵活性)。相关策略的例子包括参加合作会议,研究用户参与研究问题的改进,研究方法的培训,以及雇用SCI患者作为研究团队的一部分。主要结论:本定性研究提出了研究伙伴关系原则(规范)和相关策略(可观察的行动)。本研究可以为其他想要参与(SCI)研究伙伴关系的研究者和研究用户提供指导。本研究的结果可用于为基于证据的工具和资源的开发提供信息,以支持未来的研究伙伴关系。我们为研究人员和研究用户提供参与研究伙伴关系的指导;指导包括研究伙伴关系原则(规范)和相关策略(可观察的行动);将策略与原则联系起来可以帮助研究人员及其合作伙伴参与研究伙伴关系;本研究可以支持在研究系统中使用研究伙伴关系原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Principles and related strategies for spinal cord injury research partnership approaches: a qualitative study
Background: Conducting and/or disseminating research in partnership with potential research users is a popular approach to conducting useful and relevant research. Despite calls for guidance to support these research partnerships, evidence-based tools and resources remain limited.Aims and objectives: This study aimed to explore principles and related strategies for conducting and/or disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership with the SCI community, in order to gain insight into ways to support SCI research partnerships.This qualitative study included ten semi-structured interviews with SCI research partnership champions. The interviews focused on participants’ experiences with SCI research projects that are conducted or disseminated in partnership, and related principles and strategies to work in research partnerships.Participants mainly talked about principles related to: (1) the relationship between researchers and research users (for example, respect each other, avoid tokenism); (2) co-production of knowledge (for example, research user engagement early and throughout); and (3) meaningful engagement (for example, allowing flexibility). Examples of related strategies included attending collaborative conferences, research user engagement in refinement of research questions, training in research methods, and hiring people with SCI as part of the research team.Key conclusions: This qualitative study presents research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions). This study can provide guidance for other researchers and research users who want to engage in (SCI) research partnerships. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of evidence-based tools and resources to support future research partnerships.Key messagesWe provide guidance for researchers and research users to engage in research partnerships;The guidance includes research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions);Linking strategies to principles may help researchers and their partners to engage in research partnerships;This study can support the use of research partnership principles within a research system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信